Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 11:03:22 AM
Creation date
3/15/2013 9:42:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-19-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 the task form came up with a strategic plan that was then presented to the Animal Services <br /> 2 Advisory Board. The board unanimously adopted it. <br /> 3 Dr. White reviewed the executive summary. She said the first part of the plan is a strong <br /> 4 recommendation for micro chipping, as micro chipped animals are much more readily returned <br /> 5 to their owners. She said micro chipping used to be part of Orange County Animal Services <br /> 6 until it was cut from the county budget during a time of fiscal difficulty. She said there is now a <br /> 7 charge of$25 to place a micro-chip, and this is voluntary. She said that the new <br /> 8 recommendation is, when a stray is brought to the shelter and an owner comes to recover the <br /> 9 animal, the owner must pay for micro chipping in order for the animal to be returned. <br /> 10 Dr. White said that part two addresses whether animals should be mandatorily spayed <br /> 11 and neutered before being returning to their owner. She said that the committee was very <br /> 12 interested in moving in that direction at first. However, after reviewing the information, the <br /> 13 committee realized that this is not being locally enforced in North Carolina. She said that these <br /> 14 mandatory spay and neuter programs are unusual in the US and most national organizations <br /> 15 recommend against them. Concerns are that owners will go underground, avoiding vets and <br /> 16 licensing, in fear of mandatory spay neuter laws. She said that the shelter cannot spay or <br /> 17 neuter animals that don't belong to them. She said that this means if an owner comes to <br /> 18 recover a pet, the shelter cannot enforce spaying or neutering in the shelter before returning the <br /> 19 animal. Considering the research, it was decided that there were other ways to encourage <br /> 20 spaying/neutering animals without legislating. The committee strongly recommended an <br /> 21 education process and, as mentioned by Bob Marotto earlier, a very inexpensive or free spay <br /> 22 and neuter program. <br /> 23 Dr. White said there is need for help from the Board of County Commissioners on <br /> 24 deciding whether or not to implement a tiered and differential recovery program. She referred to <br /> 25 the tiered pay licensing system, which charges more for reproductive pets than spayed/neutered <br /> 26 pets. She said the idea is to take that model and apply it to animals who are recovered. The first <br /> 27 time an animal is recovered, it will cost a certain fee to get the animal back and the fee is different <br /> 28 depending on whether the animal is spayed/neutered or not. She said that for the second <br /> 29 recovery of the same animal, it would cost more for that animal to be recovered and there is again <br /> 30 a differential based on the reproductive status. This increase continues with the third recovery, <br /> 31 but with an added incentive to spay or neuter. For this third recovery, there will be a $100 deposit <br /> 32 that will be returned if the owner returns within 90 days to show proof that the animal has been <br /> 33 spayed or neutered. She said that with these fees and a healthy dose of education there is hope <br /> 34 that the objective of reducing the number of reproductive animals will be reached. <br /> 35 Commissioner Price asked for clarification about the $25 microchip fee and Dr. White <br /> 36 said there is an impoundment fee, inoculation fee, possible licensing fee, as well as the micro <br /> 37 chipping fee. <br /> 38 Commissioner Dorosin asked about the state veterinary rules regarding spaying and <br /> 39 neutering an animal that does not belong to the shelter. He asked how long it takes for the <br /> 40 animal to become a shelter animal. <br /> 41 Bob Marotto said the shelter holds the animal for a minimum of 5 calendar days, 3 of <br /> 42 those days the shelter must be open to the public. If it is a legally surrendered animal, the shelter <br /> 43 could decide to adopt out the animal immediately. <br /> 44 Commissioner Dorosin asked, if five days pass and the dog is reproductive, how quickly <br /> 45 would they move forward to spay it. <br /> 46 Bob Marotto said that if they think the animal is highly adoptable they may schedule it for <br /> 47 sterilization on the 6th day; otherwise, they would have someone to adopt the animal and then <br /> 48 schedule the sterilization. This avoids the cost of sterilizing an animal who is then not adopted. <br /> 49 Commissioner Dorosin asked, if the animal is not adoptable, then is it not on the <br /> 50 spay/neuter list. <br /> 51 Bob Marotto said it would not be on a spay and neuter list but on another list. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.