Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 11:03:22 AM
Creation date
3/15/2013 9:42:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-19-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 6. Public Hearings <br /> 3 <br /> 4 a. Public Transit Implementation Resolutions <br /> 5 The Board conducted a public hearing on, and considered approval of, resolutions <br /> 6 authorizing Triangle Transit Authority ("TTA") to levy a 'A-cent transit tax in Orange County, <br /> 7 authorizing Orange County to levy a $7 vehicle registration tax in Orange County, and an <br /> 8 additional $3 vehicle TTA registration tax in Orange County and authorizing the Chair to sign. <br /> 9 Chair Jacobs read the above statement. <br /> 10 John Roberts said that many meetings have been spent discussing transit and these are <br /> 11 the next steps in the process, for Durham County and Orange County to request that TTA levy <br /> 12 the 'A-cent sales tax and the additional vehicle registration fee and tax. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> 15 Dave Laodicina thanked the County Commissioners for pursuing this transit plan. He <br /> 16 said that this is a start, but there are many pieces to it. He said that urban centers will be built <br /> 17 where people live and work and will be built around the transit stations. He is ready for this plan <br /> 18 to get started. <br /> 19 Bonnie Hauser spoke for Smart Transit for Orange County, which is a group of Town <br /> 20 and County citizens. She said that they support transit but they do have questions about the <br /> 21 plan. She said that Orange County plans to spend $660 million over the next 23 years; 70% of <br /> 22 which, about $500 million, will go to light rail service. The plan relies on federal and state <br /> 23 grants. According to the plan, Orange County will add 34,000 bus hours in the first four years, <br /> 24 about 18% to a base of 203,000 hours. By contrast, Durham will add 50,000 in the first three <br /> 25 years, about 28%. Wake County, who has not yet endorsed the plan, will double its bus hours <br /> 26 if it chooses to opt in. Charlotte spent 10 years building bus service in preparation for light rail. <br /> 27 She said that frequent, convenient bus service is essential to build transit ridership. She <br /> 28 showed a spreadsheet from the transit plan appendices that show how transit dollars will be <br /> 29 spent between now and 2020. She said that from the start, the bulk of the funds will go to Light <br /> 30 Rail Transit and not bus service as has been represented to the public. <br /> 31 In addition to the sales tax, the Board will consider a $10 vehicle registration fee, a 30% <br /> 32 increase to the $33 fee; 50% if you count the $5 that TTA has already levied. No other county, <br /> 33 including Durham or Charlotte, has levied the transit fee. She said that once the County levies <br /> 34 the tax or fee, it authorizes TTA to move forward. Changes are governed by the <br /> 35 implementation agreement, which requires approval by TTA, the MPO, and the Board of County <br /> 36 Commissioners to make any changes. She asked the Board to please consider what happens <br /> 37 to the ability to negotiate on behalf of Orange County once it levies the taxes and fees. <br /> 38 Del Snow read a prepared statement: <br /> 39 "I'm Del Snow and I'm the chair the Chapel Hill Planning Board. I am proud that our <br /> 40 board is decidedly pro-transit, and although we are pleased that the voters have shown their <br /> 41 support for a '/2 cent sales tax, we have informed the Town Council that we do not support the <br /> 42 MPO 2040 transportation plan that the TTA plan is based on. Our unanimous decision was <br /> 43 based on many factors. Because of time constraints, I will share only some of them with you <br /> 44 tonight. <br /> 45 The Planning Board is encouraging the use of responsible data-based decision <br /> 46 practices. In view of that, we have serious questions about the plan's population projections. <br /> 47 Although a specific critical mass is needed to support transit, no data was presented proving <br /> 48 that Chapel Hill could successfully absorb the quantity of housing and commercial building <br /> 49 necessary for the type of transit proposed. A significant drawback to the plan is that it does not <br /> 50 support many of the Future Focus areas established by the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. These <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.