Browse
Search
Minutes - 20080519
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20080519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 10:52:46 AM
Creation date
8/22/2008 8:27:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-19-2008-C.3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-19-2008
Agenda - 05-19-2008-c1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-19-2008
Agenda - 05-19-2008-c2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-19-2008
Agenda - 05-19-2008-c4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-19-2008
Agenda - 05-19-2008-c5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-19-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
requisite public infrastructure. This section should assure the reader that work on these critical <br /> objectives is coordinated and finished such that the infrastructure will begin to come on line <br /> within the next 3-5 years, if not sooner. As it stands now, it's not clear when and how this will <br /> happen. <br /> Personally, I support the emphasis on oompaot, mixed-use developments not only <br /> because it's a good conservation strategy, but because this is the best strategy for significantly <br /> increasing the supply of housing affordable to working and middle class households. <br /> To put it another way, if the plan's implementation does not result in an increased supply <br /> of less expensive land — on a per lot basis—for residential development than currently available, <br /> then the comprehensive plan update will have little or no impact on reducing the shortage of <br /> workforce housing in the county. <br /> This points to the main flaw with the plan's housing element. It almost exclusively <br /> focuses on issues related to affordable and special needs housing; albeit an area of concern <br /> which I fully support. However, the housing element should also address the systemic problems <br /> which cause the county's housing market to skew towards upper-income housing and <br /> recommend actions for bringing the market into a more equitable balance. <br /> Finally, I encourage the Commissioners to ask themselves if they've heard from as many <br /> stakeholders as they feel is appropriate for a policy document of this significance before voting <br /> on the plan later this summer. I believe the compressed time schedule put a strain on the <br /> planning advisory boards and diminished the opportunity—especially during Phase II —for <br /> widespread and continuous community input. As such, I encourage the Commissioners to <br /> immediately solicit the written comments of each lead advisory board so that their comments <br /> can be utilized by the Planning Board as they continue to refine the plan this summer. |ndoed, <br /> one or more joint advisory board meetings at this stage would be useful in assessing community <br /> support for the proposal, as well as gathering constructive recommendations for final <br /> improvements." <br /> Holly Reid read a prepared statement: <br /> "My name is Holly Reid and I am a co-founder of the Walkable Hillsborough Coalition, a <br /> group of community volunteers who have worked the past seven years to advocate for <br /> pedestrian and bike ways for Hillsborough, surrounding communities, and Orange County. I <br /> have been involved in the exploring the possibility of reopening a train station in Hillsborough. I <br /> am also one of the twenty-nine members of the Special Transit Advisory Commission, whose <br /> charge was to recommend a regional transit system for the Triangle region to our joint <br /> Metropolitan Planning Organization representatives. Our final report will be presented to the <br /> MPO's this Wednesday, May 21, in Raleigh. <br /> Over the years and especially through my involvement on the STAC, I have learned that <br /> the Triangle area is one of the most sprawled regions in the country and that we expect a million <br /> more people to Wake, Durham, and Orange Counties in the next 20 years. I have learned that <br /> we are off-the-scale auto centric in our country, and that we are realizing the great costs of this <br /> choice every day: poor health, poor community connections, dangerous and unattractive <br /> alternative modes of getting around, disenfranchised young and old, loss of commerce in our <br /> doxvntovvns, and an irresponsible carbon footprint, to name a few. <br /> I believe our Unified Transportation Board recognizes these huge community costs. <br /> They have listed many of these as key issues in a future Comprehensive Transportation Plan <br /> that is recommended in Objective T-3.2, and they see this plan as addressing strategies for all <br /> transportation modes, including bike, pedestrian, rail and all other critical transit facilities. <br /> What is absolutely critical to righting our heavily over-weighted single modal car culture <br /> is a new multi-modal transportation system that is well emphasized in Goal 3. What needs just <br /> as much emphasis in Goal 3 is future development that is compact, walkable and in mixed-use <br /> neighborhoods along transit corridors supported by transit. Transit and pedestrian-oriented <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.