Browse
Search
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2012
>
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2019 3:52:15 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 10:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Health Department <br /> From: Tonya Lamm f mailto:tonva.lam m(a-g mail.coml <br /> Sent: Wed 9/5/2012 8:49 PM <br /> To: Bernadette Pelissier <br /> Subject: Dont EDE-1 old NC-10 <br /> The land use classification around Old NC-10 should be removed from the economic <br /> development district, and not be classified EDE-1. <br /> Old NC-10 is a beautiful rural residential road. The current Land Use Classification*AND <br /> *Zoning is "Rural Residential". Based on negative public input, the planning board proposes to <br /> retain its rural residential zoning, but desires to change the Land Use Classification from rural <br /> residential to EDEA which allows for non-residential entities. This would *negatively Impact <br /> our neighborhood in many ways (increased traffic on two-lane road, dangerous underpasses, <br /> depress home values, etc). <br /> Further, the Zoning and Land use classification would *not be consistent*, which will create <br /> conflicts later. Finally, the Durham plan keeps this entire area as residential in their urban <br /> growth plan. Thus, the Orange County and Durham plans will *not be consistent.* <br /> I would strongly urge the board not to approve this proposal. The land use classification should <br /> either remain residential or the region around Old <br /> NC-10 should be removed from this economic development district. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Tonya Lamm <br /> 6408 Mt Hermon Church Road <br /> Durham <br /> From: Marjorie Scheer)mailto:mar*orie.scheera-qmail.comI <br /> Sent: Wed 9/5/2012 9:18 PM <br /> To: Bernadette Pelissier; Valerie Foushee; Alice Gordon (External); Barry Jacobs; Earl McKee; <br /> Steve Yuhasz; Pam Hemminger(External) <br /> Subject: Maintain our rural neighborhood please! <br /> Dear Orange County Commissioners, <br /> As a citizen of Orange County who lives along Old NC-10, 1 would implore you *NOT*to accept <br /> the current Eno Economic Development District zoning and land use proposals which will be <br /> discussed tomorrow night. <br /> You have heard from numerous residents who live along Old NC-10, which is a beautiful rural <br /> residential road, protest against the possibility of non-residential entities tainting our <br /> neighborhood. The current Land Use Classification *AND *Zoning is "Rural Residential". Based <br /> on negative public input, the planning board proposes to retain rural residential zoning, but still <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.