Browse
Search
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2012
>
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2019 3:52:15 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 10:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further, the Zoning and Land use classification would not be consistent, which will create <br /> conflicts later. Finally, the Durham plan keeps this entire area as residential in their urban <br /> growth plan. Thus, the Orange County and Durham plans will not be consistent. <br /> I would strongly urge the board not to approve this proposal. The land use classification should <br /> either remain residential or the region around Old NC-10 should be removed from this <br /> economic development district. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Chris Kelsey <br /> 208 Weldon Ridge Court <br /> Durham, NC 27705 <br /> Letter from Phillip Gunter <br /> Dear Commissioner Pelissier: <br /> Thank you for your service to the citizens of Orange County. As I have noted in previous <br /> letters, because of the diversity of land use and interests among your constituents, your job <br /> must often be a daunting task. <br /> Regarding the rezoning issue in the Eno District, I remain concerned about the proposed <br /> changes. I attended the last meeting of the Planning Board (August 1, 2012). The revised <br /> proposal was approved, but not unanimously. Two board members in attendance voted against <br /> the proposal. They asked some good questions. At that meeting, I heard no good answers to <br /> those questions and concerns. <br /> My original concerns that I expressed to you in my letters of February 19, 2012; May 11, 2012; <br /> and May 21, 2012 remain: 1) storm water runoff; 2) noise pollution; and 3) air pollution. Since <br /> then, a letter written to you by Dr. Jon Arvik addressed in detail the well-defined and <br /> scientifically documented health dangers and risks caused by open-air grinding, crushing, and <br /> shredding of trash and construction debris. This activity is already "permitted" by Orange <br /> County on Mount Hermon Church road. <br /> My first two concerns, storm water runoff and noise pollution, still exist, but for the time being <br /> are dwarfed by the obvious immediate health-threatening particulate pollution of the air we <br /> breathe. We can filter the water we drink. We can wear noise suppressing ear plugs; however, <br /> we must breathe the air. Since the onset of open-air grinding, crushing and shredding on Mt. <br /> Hermon Church Road, my daughter has been diagnosed with asthma. She has been <br /> prescribed a medication for that serious condition. <br /> To protect the health of the citizens of Orange County, your help is requested in two ways: <br /> 1. Issue no more permits for businesses that might add to the particulate air pollution <br /> problem. This includes already existing business that might wish to expand. <br /> 2. Seek ways to cause existing business to take all necessary steps to eliminate any <br /> sources of particulate air pollution that existing in their business operations. <br /> To do anything less is to further endorse what has already been permitted and will likely <br /> encourage and attract to the Eno District other businesses which may create additional air <br /> pollution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.