Minutes 11-20-2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

to indicate that information verbatim as identified in the script. A Commissioner making that motion will have to read that into the record verbatim. John Roberts: If a Commissioner believes that the record does not have enough competent material or substantial evidence to meet the applicant's burden of proof, that can be substituted into some of these motions. You do not have to go back and look at specific line items in the record and say that, `this is what I don't agree with." You can set aside the entire record and say, "I do not believe that this record has enough competent material and substantial evidence to meet the applicant's burden of proof." SCRIPT FOR ACTING ON DUNHILL— DAVID WEEKLY HOMES LLC A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz to close the public hearing. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Chair Pelissier: We need to turn to motions. We can turn to page 136. Actually it really starts on page 137, the first motion. I will ask that whoever is making the motion read the motion as it is written here and when we get to the part where we have to actually cite the evidence, it's all written here. And we have it up here on the screens. a. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and 2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. VOTE: UNANIMOUS b. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. VOTE: UNANIMOUS c. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of 7.14.2 (B) of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. VOTE: UNANIMOUS d. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of 5.15.6 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. VOTE: UNANIMOUS