Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-2013 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 02-19-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-19-2013 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 9:45:32 AM
Creation date
2/15/2013 11:49:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-19-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
RES-2013-014 Resolution Regarding Legislative Matters on Statewide Issues with Exhibit
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
RES-2013-015 Resolution to Support the 2013-2015 Funding for the Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HHS-8: Increase Medicaid rates to cover costs. <br />Support a rate increase for Medicaid services to at least cover cost of service. In an effort to curb <br />Medicaid costs, legislative actions over the past 10 years routinely show a Medicaid service- <br />provider rate reduction or a reduction in the inflationary increases for reimbursement rates, <br />increases to keep pace with medical inflation. Despite a 50 percent plus increase in Medicaid <br />clients, fewer physicians are choosing to treat Medicaid clients given lower reimbursement rates <br />than that offered under private insurance plans. <br />HHS-9: Support an increase in food and lodging inspection fees to cover costs. <br />Seek legislation to increase food and lodging inspection fees or authorize county governments to <br />charge cost-based fees for restaurant and facility inspections. Unlike other inspection fees such <br />as building inspections fees that can be set to recover costs, food and lodging inspection fees are <br />set statutorily and do not reflect county costs of inspections operations and administration. The <br />state collects the current fee, which is set at $75 per annual business inspection, and returns 66 <br />percent of these revenues to the county of origin. Not only is this fee well below actual <br />inspections costs, no additional fees are permitted should county inspectors need to revisit an <br />individual business multiple times to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations. <br />HHS-10: Restore state funding of public health accreditation. <br />Seek legislation to restore state funding for the state-mandated accreditation program for county <br />public health departments. G.S. 130A-34.1 requires all local public health departments to obtain <br />and maintain accreditation, which examines a local health department's capacity to provide <br />essential public health services, its facilities and administration, its staffs’ competencies and <br />training procedures or programs and its governance and fiscal management. The process includes <br />a self-assessment, a site visit by a team of experts to clarify, verify, and amplify the information <br />in the self-assessment and accreditation approval by the Local Health Department Accreditation <br />Board, which is housed and staffed by UNC’s Institute for Public Health. Failure to obtain and <br />maintain accreditation by July 1, 2014, will jeopardize state and federal funding for public health <br />services. The 2012 State Appropriations Act eliminated the $300,000 in recurring funding to <br />support UNC administration of the public health accreditation program. <br />Intergovernmental Relations Legislative Goals <br />IGR-1: Oppose any shift of state transportation responsibilities to counties. <br />Oppose legislation to shift the state’s responsibility for funding transportation construction and <br />maintenance projects to counties. Counties cannot afford to assume costs for maintaining <br />secondary roads and/or funding expansion projects. Unlike counties in other states, whose <br />traditional funding responsibilities are secondary roads, North Carolina counties are responsible <br />for the administration of local human services programs, and fund educational operating and <br />capital expenses. The NCACC estimates that a transfer of secondary road maintenance <br />responsibilities would cost counties more than $500 million annually. Some of the more rural <br />counties would have to increase property taxes by as much as 30 cents to generate the amount of <br />revenue needed to maintain the same level of service. <br />IGR-2: Allow more cost effective methods for second primary elections. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.