Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 D. Lease Renewal and Report <br /> 3 Bring back the lease renewal for approval no later than November 2013, along with a <br /> 4 report describing the residency of those who received adult day care services during the <br /> 5 period beginning October 2012 and ending September 2013. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner <br /> 9 McKee to approve the revised by-laws for Senior Care of Orange County, Inc.; and to <br /> 10 approve the amended resolution and revised lease agreement with Senior Care of OC, <br /> 11 Inc., as stated in the above language submitted by Commissioner Gordon; and <br /> 12 authorize the Chair to sign. <br /> 13 Commissioner Dorosin said that, being new, he had not seen the old bylaws and <br /> 14 what was changed. John Roberts said there were senior staff members, the Assistant <br /> 15 County Manager and the Director of Aging, appointed to the board. The reason this <br /> 16 ties the County to the Board is not any liability issue. This is a public records case. <br /> 17 There was a public records request for the non-profit agency. The court held that the <br /> 18 non-profit had to respond because there were so many ties between the non-profit and <br /> 19 the county that it was a branch of the county government or a government agency. The <br /> 20 two primary changes as a result are that staff members are no longer appointed to the <br /> 21 board of directors and the Board of County Commissioners no longer can approve any <br /> 22 changes to the bylaws. <br /> 23 Commissioner Dorosin asked if staff were prohibited from being on the board. <br /> 24 John Roberts said they are not prohibited from being on the board, but that they <br /> 25 are no longer required by the bylaws to be on the board. <br /> 26 Frank Clifton said they worked very closely on a professional level with this non- <br /> 27 profit. He said that they will continue to work with them through Social Services and the <br /> 28 Department of Aging. It will be more of a support role instead of management role. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 31 <br /> 32 b. Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) — Approval of <br /> 33 Membership and Capacity Numbers <br /> 34 The Board considered approval of November 15, 2012 membership and capacity <br /> 35 numbers for both school districts (Orange County and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br /> 36 Schools) which will be used in developing 10-year student membership projections and <br /> 37 the 2012 SAPFO Technical Advisory Committee (SAPFOTAC) Report. <br /> 38 Planning Director Craig Benedict said this item is to approve the November 15, <br /> 39 2012 numbers submitted from our two school districts. These capacity numbers <br /> 40 include elementary, middle, and high school. Pages 3-8 of the agenda package <br /> 41 itemized specific capacities within each school. He said one change was submitted <br /> 42 from Orange County High school, which was recently downgraded by the Department of <br /> 43 Public Instruction. It used to have a capacity of 1518 students and now it is set at 1399, <br /> 44 with a decrease of 119 students. That is rarely done. Changes in capacity do not <br /> 45 normally occur through re-rating. There was a re-rating a few years ago due to class <br /> 46 size changes, which changed the capacity of the school. The membership does <br />