Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
23 <br /> 1 Chair Pelissier: We need to turn to motions. We can turn to page 136. Actually it really starts <br /> 2 on page 137, the first motion. I will ask that whoever is making the motion read the motion as it <br /> 3 is written here and when we get to the part where we have to actually cite the evidence, it's all <br /> 4 written here. And we have it up here on the screens. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 a. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 7 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's <br /> 8 compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and 2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified <br /> 9 Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. <br /> 10 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 11 <br /> 12 b. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 13 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's <br /> 14 compliance with the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of the Orange County Unified <br /> 15 Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. <br /> 16 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 17 <br /> 18 c. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 19 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's <br /> 20 compliance with the provisions of 7.14.2 (B) of the Orange County Unified Development <br /> 21 Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 24 <br /> 25 d. A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 26 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's <br /> 27 compliance with the provisions of 5.15.6 of the Orange County Unified Development <br /> 28 Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 31 <br /> 32 e. A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz to <br /> 33 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's <br /> 34 compliance with the provisions of Section 5.3.2 (B) of the Orange County Unified <br /> 35 Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 DISCUSSION: <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Commissioner Gordon: I do not find in the record enough competent material or substantial <br /> 40 evidence to meet the applicant's burden of proof. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Commissioner Jacobs: You're talking about `e', Commissioner Gordon? <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Commissioner Gordon: B, actually. This is the one that has sewage disposal facilities. It is <br /> 45 5.32B. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Commissioner McKee: To be specific, I am now reading the handout. I make a motion to <br /> 48 affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br />