Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 8:33:19 AM
Creation date
2/11/2013 8:20:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/12/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-12-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E6181 <br />rd <br />B. Mandatory Sterilization: <br />1. Surveys: No local counties surveyed require mandatory sterilization of animals repeatedly <br />recovered by their owners. The town of Asheville and Buncombe County have mandatory <br />sterilization ordinances for all owned cats and dogs. All cats and dogs must be sterilized <br />unless a permit has been purchased for $104, which is then good for the lifetime of the pet. <br />Outside of North Carolina, there are a variety of approaches towards spaying /neutering (SIN) <br />of animals. For example, Boulder, CO offers financial incentives to owners who allow their <br />pets to be sterilized prior to recovery. There are animal organizations that do require <br />mandatory sterilization of animals found running at large prior to recovery by the owner <br />(Appendix B) . <br />2. Literature review: No studies were identified that reviewed the impact of mandatory SIN <br />laws on recovery rates in stray dogs and cats. <br />3. Animal welfare organizations: Numerous organizations had posted commentaries on the <br />internet opposing mandatory spay /neuter laws for owned pets, including the ASPCA, Best <br />Friends Animal Sanctuary, American Veterinary Medical Association, Nevada Humane <br />Society, Alley Cat Allies, and FixAustin. There were no statements by organizations that <br />specifically addressed mandatory sterilization of stray cats and dogs that are repeatedly <br />recovered by their owners. <br />4. OCAS animal recovery statistics: OCAS stray cat statistics from 2007.2011 (Appendix D) <br />revealed that 182 cats during this time were recovered by their owners. Of these, 531182 <br />(29 %n) were reproductive, and 129/182 (71 %) were sterilized. 1751182 (97 %) were recovered <br />by their owners once, and of these, 521176 (30 %) were reproductive and 1241176 (70 %n) were <br />sterilized. Six cats were recovered twice. Of the six cats, 5/6 (83 %) were sterilized and 1/6 <br />(17%) was reproductive. No cats were recovered by owners more than twice. OCAS stray <br />dog statistics from 2007 -2011 (Appendix D) revealed that 1620 dogs were recovered by their <br />owners. Of these, 910/1620 (56 %) were reproductive, and 710/1620 (44 %) were <br />sterilized. 1494/1620 (92 %) were recovered by their owners once, and of these, 853/1494 <br />(57 %) were reproductive and 641/1494 (43 %) were sterilized. 9011620 dogs (6%) were <br />recovered twice, and of these, 41/90 (46 %) were reproductive and 49190 (54 %) were <br />sterilized. 2211520 (1%) dogs were recovered three times, and of these, 11122 (50 %) were <br />reproductive and 11122 (50 %) were sterilized. 911620 (0.5 %) dogs were recovered four <br />times, and of these, 519 (56%) were reproductive and 419 (44 %) were sterilized. Two dogs <br />were recovered five times (both sterilized), two dogs were recovered six times (both <br />sterilized) and one dog was recovered seven times (sterilized). <br />VI. Subcommittee Recommendations <br />A. Microchip placement: Based on review of local and national practices as well as literature <br />regarding animal recovery and microchip placement, the committee unanimously recommends <br />that OCAS mandate microchip placement in all recovered cats and dogs at the owner's expense <br />before the animal is returned to an owner.2 <br />2 Note that microchip placement for adoptable cats and dogs became elective in July 2009 (the same year <br />the new Animal Services Center opened) as a result of a required budget reduction of $42,968. <br />Previously, each adopted animal received a microchip as part of the standard adoption fee. Staff made <br />this recommendation because it was deemed less detrimental than the alternatives, e.g., reductions in the <br />supplies required to shelter and care for homeless animals, reductions in the medical budget, or the <br />erosion of the resources needed to continue to spay or neuter every adopted animal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.