Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 8:33:19 AM
Creation date
2/11/2013 8:20:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/12/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-12-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`E3 <br />14 <br />A. Microchip placement. Based on review of local practices, national practices, and literature <br />regarding animal recovery and microchip placement, the committee voted unanimously to <br />recommend to the Animal Services Advisory Board (ASAB) that Orange County Animal <br />Services mandate microchip placement in all cats and dogs at the owner's expense before the <br />animal is returned to an owner. All efforts will be made to register the animal with the microchip <br />company prior to the animal leaving the shelter. This fee will be in addition to other fees, <br />including the impoundment fee, boarding fee, rabies vaccination fee, licensing fee, and any other <br />fees the animal may have incurred during its stay at the shelter. If the owner finds these recovery <br />fees difficult to pay because of limited resources, shelter personnel will help the owner to set up a <br />payment plan. <br />B. Mandatory sterilization of stray animals repeatedly impounded by orange County Animal <br />Services. This committee was charged with considering whether legislative action should be <br />taken to require mandatory sterilization of animals repeatedly impounded by orange County <br />Animal Services and reclaimed by owners. The committee reviewed local and national practices, <br />literature, and recommendations by animal welfare organizations. The committee also reviewed <br />the data regarding numbers of stray dogs and cats recovered by owners at orange County Animal <br />Services, reproductive status, and repeated recovery rates. After the evaluation of this <br />information the committee came up with options for program actions that could be put into place <br />for recovered animals: <br />i. Requirement for mandatory sterilization after a specified number of recoveries from <br />the shelter <br />ii. Owner pays a sterilization deposit which is refunded with proof of animal sterilization <br />within a given time frame <br />iii. Charges for recovery, boarding, licensing, and other penalties would be offset by <br />agreement to sterilize the pet prior to return to the owner <br />iv. Tiered impounding fees based on reproductive status of the recovered pet, with lower <br />rates for sterilized pets (reflecting the current tiered approach to licensing currently in <br />place). <br />Six major issue were considered by subcommittee members: <br />i. Respect for owner choice <br />ii. Safety and care of the animals /pet overpopulation <br />iii. Safety of the general community <br />iv. Sensitivity to pet owners who are experiencing difficult financial circumstances <br />v. Costs incurred by Orange County Animal Services as a result of repeated <br />impoundments <br />vi. Consideration for additional time and effort required of the staff regarding <br />instatement of new recommendations <br />Review of local practices and recommendations from animal welfare organizations did not at this <br />time support a mandatory sterilization policy for repeatedly recovered pets. The impact of such a <br />policy would also be small, given that from 2007-2011, only 60 reproductive dogs and one <br />reproductive cat were repeatedly returned to an owner. The committee also thought that requiring <br />a sterilization deposit of pet owners would be a difficult approach, as it would require staff time <br />to collect and track deposits, return deposits to pet owners, and validate owner claims of pet <br />sterilization. The option of incentivizing owners to allow their pets to be sterilized prior to <br />recovery by reducing fees was also deemed difficult for a variety of reasons. orange County <br />Animal Services does not provide in -house sterilization services to pet owners at this time. The <br />organization also relies on fees to financially support the running of the shelter, and is not <br />financially in a position to consider fee discounts to pet owners. Fee reductions might be difficult <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.