Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-12-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 8:33:19 AM
Creation date
2/11/2013 8:20:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/12/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-12-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />There are owners who relinquish ownership of their animals rather than pay fees to the shelter. The hope <br />is that Orange County Animal Shelter can strengthen the current recovered animal policy to protect cats, <br />dogs, and the public, reduce unwanted litters, and incentivize owners to confine their pets <br />appropriately. Possible actions include changing legislation to require mandatory microchip placement <br />and mandatary sterilization of cats and dogs prior to owner redemption. <br />3. Best Practices at Animal Shelters. Bob shared information gathered from other communities: <br />A. Sacramento County Code 8.16.030 Redemption. In addition to ensuring timely rabies vaccination and <br />the payment of all fees, "If the impounded animal was previously impounded and released, the animal <br />may be released to the owner ... on condition that the animal has been spayed or neutered prior to its <br />release..." <br />B. Sacramento City Code 9.44.190 Required Alteration. "In order to reduce the likelihood that dogs <br />allowed to be at large shall breed unwanted animals, any dog impounded for being at large which <br />previously has been redeemed from the animal care services center after impoundment for being at large <br />shall be spayed or neutered at the redeeming owner's expense prior to a second or subsequent <br />redemption." <br />C. Minneapolis Animal Care and Control. "Upon redemption of any lawfully impounded dog or cat over <br />six (6) months of age found at large and not previously sterilized, the owner shall deposit with the animal <br />control shelter a sterilization deposit fee ... Such sterilization deposit shall be fully refundable upon proof <br />that the animal has been sterilized by a licensed veterinarian within forty -five (45) days..." <br />Similar sterilization ordinances have been passed by the following communities: Artesia, New Mexico; <br />State of Utah; Tulsa, Oklahoma; New York, New York; St. Louis, Missouri; and Eugene, Oregon. <br />4. SuRaested amendment to current Orange County Animal Services Recovered Stra y Animal <br />ordinance; Members of the task force discussed the addition of licensing requirements, mandatary <br />microchip placement, and mandatory sterilization of recovered animals. <br />Part 1. Ensuring licensing that is current. Issues and solutions regarding pet licensing in Orange County <br />are currently being addressed by an alternative committee. Therefore this committee will not address <br />changes to license regulations at this time. <br />Part 2. Microchip placement. Placement of microchips in dogs and cats prior to pet adoption has been <br />shown to improve subsequent stray pet recovery rates. The Animal Services Advisory Board has <br />reviewed the possibility of recommending that the Grange County Animal Shelter take on the <br />responsibility and cost of implanting microchips in all adopted pets. However, due to budget constraints, <br />such a policy can not be put into place at this time. In selected populations, mandatory microchip <br />placement may be appropriate. Additional advantages of placing a microchip in recovered stray animals <br />include: <br />A. Reduced staff time and effort in the identification of the pet. <br />B. Reduced owner confusion regarding the identity of a pet. <br />C. Easier documentation of stray pets repeatedly brought to the shelter. <br />D. Proof of ownership in situations in which the owner denies responsibility for the stray pet. <br />This committee will consider recommending mandatory microchip placement in any stray cat or dog that <br />is subsequently recovered by its owner. The owner must pay the expense of the placement of the <br />microchip and register the appropriate contact information before the animal is released to the owner. <br />The owner will be made aware of the consequences of additional requirements should the animal be <br />recovered a second or third time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.