Browse
Search
Minutes 12-06-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 12-06-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:16:08 AM
Creation date
2/6/2013 2:08:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/6/2012
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with its current process is that it is going to be somewhat of a new makeup. He would be afraid <br /> that it might be slowed down or there may be other agendas with new members joining it. He <br /> suggested getting to the end of the conversation on the community center and then starting a <br /> phase 2 with new members and tackling the sewer issues. <br /> Council Member Storrow said that none of these ideas are in opposition to each other. <br /> He said that it seems like if the task force is stopped, the community center would probably still <br /> get built. Regardless of the structure, he thinks that the community center is finished. There <br /> are more structural questions than philosophical. He said that there should be some <br /> mechanism to continue a conversation. He said that if the task force is totally dismantled then <br /> some of the sewer questions may not be answered. <br /> Council Member Ward said that if Council Member Pease agreed with Commissioner <br /> Rich then now he does also. He said that this task force has been very effective and the <br /> membership will be changed, and it is appropriate to rehash. He said that the Board of County <br /> Commissioners is in control of setting the agenda for the task force. He said that the community <br /> center is now checked off the list and is now in the hands of staff. He feels confident to take the <br /> center off the list and then let the task force tackle these other issues and keep the community <br /> members on it, whichever form it may take. <br /> Alderman Slade said that the task force should be kept intact. He said that the <br /> community center is a done deal. He said that there is a lot of work to be done with the sewer. <br /> He strongly supports continuing with this effective task force. <br /> Commissioner Rich said that at the beginning of the task force for the first two months, <br /> they were read the charge. She thinks that the task force has fulfilled the charge and if the task <br /> force is asked to continue, the charge must be changed. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that the task force should continue with the current members. <br /> There are three members whose situations have changed, but the community has not changed. <br /> He said that the charge of the task force was not to make sure that any governmental entity <br /> came out on the better end of the deal. The charge was to ensure that the community came out <br /> on the better end. The members of the task force as it is currently constructed have spent <br /> almost a year working on this. He suggested leaving this task force constructed as it is with the <br /> current members as they are unless they have other obligations to prevent them from being <br /> able to attend. <br /> Alderman Gist said that she supported continuing with the task force because it gives <br /> the staff and elected bodies someone to talk to about the issues. She would like the task force <br /> to continue to address the community center issue and the continuing costs of operating the <br /> center and other unknowns. <br /> Mayor Chilton said that he agreed with Aldermen Gist. He said that this task force was <br /> created by the Board of County Commissioners and the reality is that the County <br /> Commissioners need to decide how it moves forward. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that it has been helpful to hear everything. He said that he has <br /> brought up the issue of gentrification several times, but it was not discussed in detail and was <br /> not part of the charge of the task force. If the task force goes forward, the charge should be <br /> revised. <br /> � Greene Tract Historical Information and Options <br /> Michael Talbert said that the Greene Tract was purchased in 1984 and it was 164 acres. <br /> As it transitioned from Chapel Hill to Orange County, the interlocal agreement gave 60 acres to <br /> remain as an asset of solid waste and 104 acres would be conveyed to Orange County, the <br /> Town of Chapel Hill, and the Town of Carrboro, based on the percentages of 43%, 43%, and <br /> 14%. There was a condition that the entities will pay back the solid waste fund so that there <br /> would be adequate funds for the future for landfill closure costs. All of this transpired between <br /> 2001-2008. In 2001, there was a Greene Tract work group that came back with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.