Browse
Search
Minutes 12-06-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 12-06-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:16:08 AM
Creation date
2/6/2013 2:08:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/6/2012
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. The managers propose that a "County Sewer District" be created for the Rogers <br /> Road area as well as adjoining areas that do not have sewer, and that the district <br /> use the special assessment process to recoup some of the costs of extending sewer <br /> service to these areas. Presumably, the proposal is referring to a County Water and <br /> Sewer District created pursuant to Article 6 of G. S. Chapter 162A. Such a district <br /> would be a legally separate municipal corporation, but the governing body of the <br /> district would be the Orange County Board of Commissioners. Such a district could <br /> issue its own bonds to raise the capital to cover the cost of extending the lines. <br /> Assessments could be based on various criteria listed in G.S. 153A-186 including <br /> "the area of land served...at an equal rate per unit of area," which would mean that <br /> properties with greater development or redevelopment potential would pay more than <br /> small properties, but the statute does not provide a way to exempt from the <br /> assessments specific properties based on criteria not listed in the statute. Thus, if <br /> the objective is to extend sewer lines at little or no cost to the longstanding owners of <br /> properties in the Rogers Road area, but to recapture some of the cost of extending <br /> the lines when properties in this area are developed or redeveloped, the special <br /> assessment process appears to be a useful tool. <br /> An alternative might be to establish the District and have the District issue its bonds to <br /> raise the cost of extending the lines. Carrboro could contract with the District to pay for the cost <br /> of extending the lines to serve properties that are within the town. The District would contract <br /> with OWASA to operate and maintain the lines and to bill the customers in the same manner as <br /> other OWASA customers. (An amendment to the WSMPBA would probably be needed). Then <br /> the District could establish a fee— call it a service line extension fee —that would be designed to <br /> recoup some of the costs incurred by the District in extending the lines. (OWASA has an <br /> "availability fee" that is designed to recoup the cost of the treatment plant and major outfalls, but <br /> this fee does not cover the service lines because those are typically installed at the developer's <br /> expense). This fee would be paid at the same time as OWASA's availability fee—when a <br /> connection is made. The District's policy could provide that the service line extension fee would <br /> be waived for the first connection made to any property existing as of a specified date." <br /> Aldermen Slade said that the proposal does not mean that they would not be providing <br /> their portion of the costs for the community center and the sewer. He said that$900,000 <br /> represents 14% of those two costs aggregated. It is more of a way to facilitate technically the <br /> management of the two projects. <br /> Aldermen Gist said that she appreciated the memo today because it pointed out <br /> potential "alligators" that could damage the whole project and the whole effort. She thinks that <br /> these are very serious, pragmatic, legal issues that have to be dealt with. She wants to invite <br /> the task force to address these issues. <br /> Commissioner Rich suggested that the task force hand this over to the managers, <br /> attorneys, and planning departments. She thinks that the issues coming up from the attorney <br /> are things that managers and attorneys have to make everyone aware of. She thinks that the <br /> task force has met the charge and has identified the monies. She also thinks that they have <br /> identified their commitment to sewer and the community center. She does not want to keep <br /> discussing this without making sure that all of the managers have discussed this. She does not <br /> want to hold any of this back. <br /> Mayor Chilton said that Carrboro elected officials are in an unusual position in that a <br /> huge portion of the sewer component and the costs of serving the entire area happens to fall <br /> within the town limits of Carrboro. However, the number of homeowners and renters to be <br /> served who live in the Carrboro town limits is very small. He said that Carrboro is very happy to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.