Agenda - 02-05-2013 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 1 with its current process is that it is going to be somewhat of a new makeup. He would be afraid 2 that it might be slowed down or there may be other agendas with new members joining it. He 3 suggested getting to the end of the conversation on the community center and then starting a 4 phase 2 with new members and tackling the sewer issues. 5 Council Member Storrow said that none of these ideas are in opposition to each other. 6 He said that it seems like if the task force is stopped, the community center would probably still 7 get built. Regardless of the structure, he thinks that the community center is finished. There 8 are more structural questions than philosophical. He said that there should be some 9 mechanism to continue a conversation. He said that if the task force is totally dismantled then 10 some of the sewer questions may not be answered. 11 Council Member Ward said that if Council Member Pease agreed with Commissioner 12 Rich then now he does also. He said that this task force has been very effective and the 13 membership will be changed, and it is appropriate to rehash. He said that the Board of County 14 Commissioners is in control of setting the agenda for the task force. He said that the community 15 center is now checked off the list and is now in the hands of staff. He feels confident to take the 16 center off the list and then let the task force tackle these other issues and keep the community 17 members on it, whichever form it may take. 18 Alderman Slade said that the task force should be kept intact. He said that the 19 community center is a done deal. He said that there is a lot of work to be done with the sewer. 20 He strongly supports continuing with this effective task force. 21 Commissioner Rich said that at the beginning of the task force for the first two months, 22 they were read the charge. She thinks that the task force has fulfilled the charge and if the task 23 force is asked to continue, the charge must be changed. 24 Commissioner McKee said that the task force should continue with the current members. 25 There are three members whose situations have changed, but the community has not changed. 26 He said that the charge of the task force was not to make sure that any governmental entity 27 came out on the better end of the deal. The charge was to ensure that the community came out 28 on the better end. The members of the task force as it is currently constructed have spent 29 almost a year working on this. He suggested leaving this task force constructed as it is with the 30 current members as they are unless they have other obligations to prevent them from being 31 able to attend. 32 Alderman Gist said that she supported continuing with the task force because it gives 33 the staff and elected bodies someone to talk to about the issues. She would like the task force 34 to continue to address the community center issue and the continuing costs of operating the 35 center and other unknowns. 36 Mayor Chilton said that he agreed with Aldermen Gist. He said that this task force was 37 created by the Board of County Commissioners and the reality is that the County 38 Commissioners need to decide how it moves forward. 39 Chair Jacobs said that it has been helpful to hear everything. He said that he has 40 brought up the issue of gentrification several times, but it was not discussed in detail and was 41 not part of the charge of the task force. If the task force goes forward, the charge should be 42 revised. 43 44 21 Greene Tract Historical Information and Options 45 Michael Talbert said that the Greene Tract was purchased in 1984 and it was 164 acres. 46 As it transitioned from Chapel Hill to Orange County, the interlocal agreement gave 60 acres to 47 remain as an asset of solid waste and 104 acres would be conveyed to Orange County, the 48 Town of Chapel Hill, and the Town of Carrboro, based on the percentages of 43%, 43%, and 49 14%. There was a condition that the entities will pay back the solid waste fund so that there 50 would be adequate funds for the future for landfill closure costs. All of this transpired between 51 2001-2008. In 2001 , there was a Greene Tract work group that came back with