Orange County NC Website
7 <br /> 1 6. The managers propose that a "County Sewer District" be created for the Rogers <br /> 2 Road area as well as adjoining areas that do not have sewer, and that the district <br /> 3 use the special assessment process to recoup some of the costs of extending sewer <br /> 4 service to these areas. Presumably, the proposal is referring to a County Water and <br /> 5 Sewer District created pursuant to Article 6 of G. S. Chapter 162A. Such a district <br /> 6 would be a legally separate municipal corporation, but the governing body of the <br /> 7 district would be the Orange County Board of Commissioners. Such a district could <br /> 8 issue its own bonds to raise the capital to cover the cost of extending the lines. <br /> 9 Assessments could be based on various criteria listed in G.S. 153A-186 including <br /> 10 "the area of land served...at an equal rate per unit of area," which would mean that <br /> 11 properties with greater development or redevelopment potential would pay more than <br /> 12 small properties, but the statute does not provide a way to exempt from the <br /> 13 assessments specific properties based on criteria not listed in the statute. Thus, if <br /> 14 the objective is to extend sewer lines at little or no cost to the longstanding owners of <br /> 15 properties in the Rogers Road area, but to recapture some of the cost of extending <br /> 16 the lines when properties in this area are developed or redeveloped, the special <br /> 17 assessment process appears to be a useful tool. <br /> 18 An alternative might be to establish the District and have the District issue its bonds to <br /> 19 raise the cost of extending the lines. Carrboro could contract with the District to pay for the cost <br /> 20 of extending the lines to serve properties that are within the town. The District would contract <br /> 21 with OWASA to operate and maintain the lines and to bill the customers in the same manner as <br /> 22 other OWASA customers. (An amendment to the WSMPBA would probably be needed). Then <br /> 23 the District could establish a fee — call it a service line extension fee — that would be designed to <br /> 24 recoup some of the costs incurred by the District in extending the lines. (OWASA has an <br /> 25 "availability fee" that is designed to recoup the cost of the treatment plant and major outfalls, but <br /> 26 this fee does not cover the service lines because those are typically installed at the developer's <br /> 27 expense). This fee would be paid at the same time as OWASA's availability fee — when a <br /> 28 connection is made. The District's policy could provide that the service line extension fee would <br /> 29 be waived for the first connection made to any property existing as of a specified date." <br /> 30 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Aldermen Slade said that the proposal does not mean that they would not be providing <br /> 34 their portion of the costs for the community center and the sewer. He said that $900,000 <br /> 35 represents 14% of those two costs aggregated. It is more of a way to facilitate technically the <br /> 36 management of the two projects. <br /> 37 Aldermen Gist said that she appreciated the memo today because it pointed out <br /> 38 potential "alligators" that could damage the whole project and the whole effort. She thinks that <br /> 39 these are very serious, pragmatic, legal issues that have to be dealt with. She wants to invite <br /> 40 the task force to address these issues. <br /> 41 Commissioner Rich suggested that the task force hand this over to the managers, <br /> 42 attorneys, and planning departments. She thinks that the issues coming up from the attorney <br /> 43 are things that managers and attorneys have to make everyone aware of. She thinks that the <br /> 44 task force has met the charge and has identified the monies. She also thinks that they have <br /> 45 identified their commitment to sewer and the community center. She does not want to keep <br /> 46 discussing this without making sure that all of the managers have discussed this. She does not <br /> 47 want to hold any of this back. <br /> 48 Mayor Chilton said that Carrboro elected officials are in an unusual position in that a <br /> 49 huge portion of the sewer component and the costs of serving the entire area happens to fall <br /> 50 within the town limits of Carrboro. However, the number of homeowners and renters to be <br /> 51 served who live in the Carrboro town limits is very small. He said that Carrboro is very happy to <br />