Orange County NC Website
M <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor and Town Council <br />FROM: Roger L. Stancil, Town Manager <br />SUBJECT: Triangle Fire District request from Orange County <br />DATE: January 14, 2013 <br />PURPOSE <br />The staff memorandum from Fire Chief Dan Jones provides an analysis and describes options <br />relative to Orange County's request to realign fire districts in the southern part of the County. <br />The County proposes to a contract with Chapel Hill to provide fire protection in a service district <br />within the urban services boundary, but outside of and adjacent to Town limits, to serve a <br />particular neighborhood. We have no obligation to provide primary fire protection outside of the <br />Town limits. We do have mutual aid agreements in place to provide response assistance to our <br />neighboring emergency services agencies. This neighborhood currently benefits from such an <br />agreement. Orange County has identified, from their perspective, that a service agreement with <br />Chapel Hill for fire protection is their first choice to resolve the issue. <br />ISSUES and CONCERNS <br />Orange County and the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro have a long standing plan for orderly <br />growth of urban areas while preserving rural areas of the County. This plan has been successful <br />in minimizing sprawl within Orange County, allowing municipalities to provide urban level <br />services and preserving the benefits of nearby rural areas and farms. The neighborhood in <br />question is included in the urban services boundary and the Town's extra - territorial jurisdiction <br />and, under past policies of the state, clearly intended to be part of the Town eventually. I am not <br />sure why this area has not been annexed under previous annexation authorities. <br />Recent actions by the NC General Assembly have severely limited the ability of Towns to <br />initiate annexation. A referendum is now required and a simple majority of all registered voters <br />from only the proposed annexed area who actually vote in the referendum voting against the <br />annexation would prevent the annexation from going into effect. For annexation of this <br />neighborhood to occur through voluntary petition, it must be initiated by a 100% petition from <br />the property owners. In all meetings with Orange County and citizens on this issue we have <br />reiterated our position that annexation would be the most effective means to resolve this issue <br />and the solution we recommend first and foremost. Because the petition process requires 100% <br />of the affected properties to be party to the request, it is practically impossible to achieve that <br />outcome and in this case there are residents who have already stated opposition to that option. <br />Annexation would avail those residents the full benefit of all Town services and also include <br />them as participants in Town direction and cost of service. <br />There is a business argument to accept the County's request to provide the fire protection service <br />and receive the associated revenue since the Fire Chief s analysis indicates that the service <br />demand can be absorbed within existing resource levels. Since we already respond to this area <br />