Orange County NC Website
37 <br />3. That the governing boards continue to appropriate funds, as previously budgeted to <br />reimburse the Solid Waste fund for the purchase of the Greene Tract, for both a New <br />Community Center and Sewer Improvements. Funds budgeted in Fiscal Year <br />2012/2013 for the Greene Tract are as follows; $90,549 for Orange County, $90,549 <br />for the Town of Chapel Hill and $29,524 for the Town of Carrboro. The governing <br />boards are also encouraged to locate other funding sources for a New Community <br />Center and Sewer Improvements. <br />4. That the Hogan- Rogers House no longer be considered as an option for a <br />Neighborhood Community Center. The St. Paul's AME Church is working with the <br />Chapel Hill Preservation Society to save the structure. <br />5. That the Task Force continue to meet to address the Charge of the Task Force, for <br />an additional six months with the original composition of the Task Force. The <br />composition of the Task Force originally included two members appointed by each <br />Town (Chapel Hill and Carrboro); two members appointed from the County; and two <br />members appointed from Rogers Eubanks Neighborhood Association (RENA). <br />There are several recommendations that have not been finalized and that is why the <br />Task Force wants to continue to meet. The first is the community center. There needs to be a <br />memorandum of understanding of how the center is going to operate, who will pay for it, who <br />will construct it, who will occupy it, and what type of interlocal agreement or memorandum of <br />understanding would be between the Towns, Habitat and the Rogers Road Neighborhood <br />Association for the operation and the program /activities to be provided. <br />The second item is the sewer district. The managers suggested that there be a Rogers <br />Road County Sewer District. There are a lot of details to be worked out with that. The <br />recommendation is that the managers continue to work on this issue and participate with the <br />Towns and OWASA to study this idea. The managers could work with the attorneys to create <br />criteria that would enable homeowners that have lived in the Historic Rogers Road <br />Neighborhood before 1972 to connect from the sewer system free of charge and recommend a <br />sliding scale fee structure for homeowners that moved to the neighborhood between 1972 and <br />2012. <br />Attachments D and E have attorney opinions. There are many legal issues yet to be <br />worked out over multi - jurisdictional lines. <br />Chair of the Task Force Pam Hemminger said that the task force was determined to <br />finish its work as soon as possible. She hopes that the County will approve starting the drafting <br />of the Memorandum of Understanding between the County, the Towns, and Habitat. There are <br />lots of different options still to be considered and lots of information still to be pulled together. <br />This is why the task force wants to continue to meet. <br />Aldermen Gist said that there have been several memos from their attorney in the past <br />couple of weeks. She asked if he would be willing to share about the latest memo. <br />Town of Carrboro Attorney Mike Brough said that, with respect to the community center, <br />the issues that he raised had to do with the role of Habitat. He said that there would have to be <br />a bidding process and it was not clear to him how there would be a bidding process. Habitat is <br />not going to be construction the center and it is his understanding that the County would <br />continue to own the center. He said that there are a lot of details that remain unclear to him. <br />The other issue that he expressed to the Carrboro Board of Aldermen is the ongoing operation <br />and maintenance of the center. He understands that the intent of the County is that whatever <br />funds are distributed are not continued to be ongoing. He suggested that some consideration <br />be given to this. His recommendation is that the board considers whether the planning should <br />be directed solely to the sewer project as opposed to the community center. If all three bodies <br />are operating the community center there are issues about the programs, etc. The memo is <br />shown below: <br />