Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-24-2013 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 01-24-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-24-2013 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:53:34 PM
Creation date
1/18/2013 2:59:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/24/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-24-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
ORD-2013-003 Ordinance Amending the OC UDO Text - Incorporate Changes Suggested by MuniCode (UDO/Zoning 2012-15)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Statutes /Rules. The changes have been suggested by MuniCode, a corporation <br />retained by Orange County to codify the County's ordinances, and are a result of <br />MuniCode's legal review of the County's UDO. The legal review was completed in <br />order to prepare the ordinance for codification. The changes are not substantive but <br />the text amendment must go through the normal amendment process since the <br />County's UDO does not allow for manifest errors to be corrected without a formal <br />amendment. <br />2. Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the Planning <br />Director is required to: `cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based <br />upon that analysis, prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning <br />Board and the Board of County Commissioners'. The following information is offered: <br />These amendments are being proposed in order to ensure the correct State <br />statutes /rules are referenced in the UDO and to ensure the requirements of the UDO <br />are consistent with State statutes. <br />The change to the language in Section 6.16.4 is being proposed because §113A -8(b) <br />of the North Carolina General Statutes states that major development projects for <br />which an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required by a Federal or State <br />agency shall be exempt from EIS submittal requirements of a local government. <br />However, since the local government can require that the applicant submit a copy of <br />the EIS submitted to the Federal or State agency, staff is suggesting that said EIS <br />may be required. <br />3. Comprehensive Plan Linkage (i.e. Principles, Goals and Objectives) <br />No direct linkage to the Principles, Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive <br />Plan. This amendment is proposed in order to engage in "good housekeeping" by <br />correcting reference errors in the UDO and ensuring the requirements of the UDO <br />are consistent with State statutes. <br />4. New Statutes and Rules <br />Some of the proposed corrections are attributable to changes made over the years in <br />the numbering system used by the State. <br />C. PROCESS <br />1. TIMEFRAME /MILESTONES /DEADLINES <br />a. BOCC Authorization to Proceed <br />....October 2 ..2012 <br />b. Quarterly Public Hearin <br />November 19. 2012 <br />2 <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.