Minutes - 20080408 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chair Jacobs suggested that the County Commissioners concede that there are different recollections. Environment and Resource Conservation Director Dave Stancil said that his recollection is that, as the 60 acres was officially designated in 2002, the County looked at creating the 60 acres based on both the mature hardwoods that were present on site and access to the rail line for some purpose in the future. Also, he remembers that the only statement that Orange County has officially made about the ultimate use of the 60 acres is a letter that went to Mayor Rosemary Waldorf in 2000 that indicated that it was the County's current intent to retain it as open space. To his knowledge, there has been no further elaboration on what that means. Environmental/natural features/preservation parameters: Dave Stancil said that this area is the headwaters of three different drainage basins. There are areas with mature hardwoods. The most ecologically sensitive portions of the property are the northernmost portions. More recently, the County has been talking with Triangle Land Conservancy for a couple of years about conservation easements on the property, specifically the 86 acres of joint open space. He made reference to Attachment 1, which indicates that TLC has agreed in principle to hold the conservation easement. TLC is also willing to hold an easement on the County's 60 acres, which would be a separate easement. He read the three issues on Attachment 1: 1. Do the three jurisdictions wish to proceed with placing a conservation easement on Tract 3 and adopt a revised concept plan? 2. Does Orange County wish to amend the Interlocal Agreement to provide for and place a separate conservation easement on its 60 acres (Tract 1), with lessened monitoring provisions? 3. Does the County agree with the proposed Guiding Principles and Parameters (Attachment 4) for the conservation easement(s)? 4. There will likely be some stewardship endowment funding requested by TLC for the easement on Tract 3, which has not yet been calculated. Chair Jacobs made reference to issue number two and "lessened monitoring provisions." Dave Stancil said that for a couple of years, there has been discussion about placing the 60 acres in the Lands Legacy program and using the County staff to monitor it, which would avoid the stewardship costs. Utility Existing and Proposed: Craig Benedict said that there was public water in the area adjacent to Tract 2. There are no existing gravity systems there, but there is a gravity sewer system in the Rush Hollow subdivision, which is a Habitat for Humanity project. There is another Habitat project of about 40 units in Chapel Hill, which is in process, and this would bring sewer directly to the western portion of the affordable housing tract. The best way to service gravity utilities to this area would be OWASA. Regarding the possibility of a school site in the general area, if there was an area to the south of the site that could be used for ball fields in conjunction with the school and possibly a community park, an area could be added adjacent to the affordable housing tract, and this would not have to be serviced by a sewer system. The Rogers Road neighborhood and task force passed a resolution that said that it was in agreement with the school board pursuing further analysis of part of this affordable housing tract for an urban-sized school. Chair Jacobs said that he was in touch with Ed Holland from OWASA today, who sent him an email indicating that it would cost $3-3.5 million to extend sewer to this area. Commissioner Carey asked if the potential for placing a school on the site would reduce the number of affordable housing units that the site would accommodate. Craig Benedict said