Minutes - 20080408 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chair Jacobs said that the Greene Tract is being discussed as a possible school site. Laura Blackmon said that the reason this whole thing started is because the entities need to start paying back the solid waste enterprise fund, and this triggered the discussions about doing things on this site and whether some of the earlier thoughts should be reevaluated. Commissioner Nelson suggested having a better copy of a map, because he cannot see the three different tracts. He also suggested having one term for "decision points". Chair Jacobs suggested sticking with the discussion points, because no decisions will be made until all partners come together. Commissioner Carey said that there has never been any real agreement on how many units of affordable housing can go on the tract. Commissioner Gordon described the differences among the tracts. She said that the 104 acres (2 tracts) is a joint property and has part affordable housing and part open space. The 60-acre tract is different and was given to the County. She does not agree that the County has to start paying back on the 60 acres, because it was given to the County as a solid waste system asset. She suggested that there be two different conversations —one with the Assembly of Governments about the 104 acres and one within the County government about the 60 acres. Chair Jacobs said that the attorney is saying that the County did not adequately decide this with the other two entities. Background Land Use and Ownership: Planning Director Craig Benedict said that there are three tracts. Tract 1 is 60 acres that is part of the solid waste system asset. Tract 2 is an 18-acre affordable housing tract. Tract 3 is 86 acres for park and open space. Tracts 2 and 3 are the 104 acres that is of joint ownership between Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County. With the original concept plan group, the reason for the affordable housing tract being where it is, was because it could be serviced by a gravity sewer system, and the Tract 3 area is part of three headwaters and is the most environmentally sensitive. The original land use plan for the entire Greene Tract was when the joint planning area was done in 1987 and said, "Landfill Pending Further Study." The joint land use plan was then changed in 2001-2002 to solid waste purposes in one area and affordable housing and open space in the other area, so there was a conscious amendment to the land use. Commissioner Gordon said that Chapel Hill was in charge of solid waste, and Chapel Hill wanted Orange County to take it over. One part of the agreement was that Orange County got a certain amount of the property free and clear, and it was to be used as a landfill asset. Later on, there was some discussion about the hardwoods, but it was never in writing. Chair Jacobs suggested looking over the minutes from some of those Board of County Commissioner meetings, because there seem to be different recollections. Commissioner Carey agreed. Commissioner Nelson said that he has a different perspective because he was involved in the Town of Carrboro at the time. He has a very clear recollection that the County was adamant that it wanted those 60 acres for solid waste purposes. The purposes were undefined, but the County was adamant about having the 60 acres for solid waste purposes. Commissioner Gordon said that she also remembers it this way. Commissioner Carey said that the County Commissioners were adamant about having the 60 acres as a landfill asset, but not for landfill functions. He thought that the Board was clear about that. Geof Gledhill said that the Board was clear about not burying waste. The agreement prohibits burying solid waste and construction and demolition waste. However, it is just as clear on the other side of this that the land is to be used for solid waste purposes.