Orange County NC Website
resolution. There should be no action tonight. He wants to be able to give OWASA clear <br /> direction. <br /> Mayor Foy said that there should be acknowledgement and everything should be written <br /> down so that OWASA has a clear understanding of each entity's intentions. <br /> Mark Chilton said that if you read through all of the resolution there is only a passing <br /> mention of land usage and conservation. He said that he does not see the local government <br /> entities passing a resolution that speaks to the question of water supply without addressing <br /> conservation and efficiency as a simple part of the water supply plan. <br /> Chair Jacobs listed the elements that he has heard: whatever direction that is given to <br /> OWASA be written; address the issue of emergency access to Jordan Lake; <br /> compilation/discussion of current conservation efforts; and Chatham County would like some <br /> kind of answer this summer in order to move forward. He said that, in listening to the last part of <br /> the conversation, it might be useful for the boards in Orange County to draft an alternative <br /> resolution that addresses the same partnership, but in terms that make people feel more <br /> comfortable about a partnership. <br /> Ted Voorhees, Deputy City Manager of Durham, said that he was the author of the <br /> resolution. He said that it was Durham's intention to call out the fact that responsible land use <br /> planning will be an integral part. He apologized for not saying this well. He thinks that the City <br /> Council fully understood the relationship between land use planning and water demand. He <br /> said that Durham has been doing water conservation for a long time. <br /> Clarifying questions of various board members were answered by Ted Voorhees. <br /> Buckhorn Village <br /> Craig Benedict said that Buckhorn Village is a planned development zoning proposal that <br /> was submitted to Orange County for a 130-acre parcel located on 1-85/1-40. He showed this <br /> area on a map. It is located within a land use designation of an Economic Development District. <br /> There is a public information process tomorrow night. <br /> Dan Coleman asked when action would be taken and Chair Jacobs said not tomorrow <br /> night. There is no deadline yet because neither the County Commissioners nor the Planning <br /> Board has had a chance to ask questions or make comments. <br /> Dan Coleman asked if transportation improvements had been identified yet and if the <br /> developer would pay for those and Chair Jacobs said that this has not been discussed yet. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that on April 29th the JPA public hearing is scheduled, and there is <br /> almost always no item for this, and he would like to talk about the Greene Tract within the AOG. <br /> He suggested scheduling an AOG meeting on this date. All must bring forward some funding to <br /> the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund if they are going to access this property. <br /> Commissioner Carey suggested that staff make a list of issues that need to be discussed <br /> at this next meeting so that there is a clear focus of discussion. <br /> Commissioner Gordon suggested that each jurisdiction may want to discuss the Greene <br /> Tract ahead of time. <br /> The next meeting will be hosted by the Town of Hillsborough. <br /> 41 Greene Tract Update <br /> DEFERRED <br /> El Update on the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) <br /> DEFERRED <br />