Minutes - 20080311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Nelson said that he believes that there is not a clear rationale articulated for a 60-40 split, other than it is a formula similar to what is used in a different set of circumstances. Laura Blackmon said that this is a new additional revenue source that is being put into the pot, and the pot is split the same. Geof Gledhill said that if the Board adopts the resolution, it will say what Commissioner Nelson is saying —the County would be earmarking 40% for parks. Commissioner Gordon made reference to the "Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved" statements and said that she envisioned that when they went to the voters, they would tell the voters some of the actual under-funded projects. She thinks that these statements would confuse people because it does not state what will be done in the near future. Donna Coffey said that this issue is part of the package for the next Board of County Commissioners' meeting. Commissioner Gordon said to hold this discussion until tomorrow night. She wants to tell the voters exactly what this funding is going to be used for. Commissioner Carey said that it would be a terrible mistake to start changing the capital funding policy just because there is a new revenue source envisioned. He said that 40% in the past has not just been parks. He said that the parks may consume most of the 40% funds, because they are expensive. At some point, the County will have caught up on park development and then it will free up funds for other projects. Until that time, the Board should keep its 60-40 policy. Commissioner Foushee said that the immediate concern is acquiring the additional revenue stream, and in order to do that, the Board has to ensure that the public understands that the County will spend any acquired funds on the immediate schools and capital needs. The trend is that when the funds are not there, the park projects and others are pushed outward in the capital plan. She said that the public needs to understand how the County will spend the funds. The 60-40 plan is simply an internal direction to staff to know how to move the monies when they are acquired. She thinks that it has been communicated clearly that the Board plans to spend this money, if acquired, on school and park projects. To change the policy now does not serve the Board well. Chair Jacobs said that he made a list of park projects— Twin Creeks, another phase of the Northern Park, another phase of the Fairview Park, Blackwood Farm, another phase for West Ten (tennis and playground components), second phase of Julia Blackwood Farm, Kirby property, McGowan Creek Preserve, and Seven Mile Creek Preserve. He said that it will be awhile before the County depletes the needs for park development. He said that he agreed with Commissioner Gordon in that they need to talk about these projects so that everyone understands that they have a stake in this new revenue source and that there is a benefit to the public. Commissioner Nelson said that he is not advocating a change in policy, but he views what is in the resolution as a change in the policy because of how it plays out in the practical sense —that parks would be getting 40% and that is not what they are getting now because there are other projects. He wants to avoid a change in policy and he wants a rationale for the 60-40 that's proposed. Commissioner Foushee said that she does not see the County using the 40% for only park projects over a number of years. Commissioner Gordon said that she does not see any disconnect between what they are all saying. She said that she just wants to list the projects that would be funded. Chair Jacobs asked Donna Coffey to flag the most appropriate projects to mention as needing immediate funding. Laura Blackmon said that the resolution specifically states parks and she is not sure what the process would be if it needed to be changed. Commissioner Foushee said that it should follow the first statement of the resolution that