Browse
Search
Orange County Strategic Information Technology Plan
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Reports
>
Orange County Strategic Information Technology Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2013 9:01:14 AM
Creation date
1/8/2013 9:01:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/8/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
7b
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!¯¯¤£¨· " )4 '®µ¤± ¢¤ <br /> <br />Description of Factors: <br /> <br />1.Statutory Compliance: 15% <br />Statutory Compliance is meant to provide priority to projects th <br />federal statute. This does not cover process improvements for fu <br />or replacement of systems which have a viable alternative. Credi <br />afforded in other sections of the scoring model. <br />Weight: A 10 (10 being the highest) in this area would be appropriate if <br />a new law, and it must take place in the current year of the sub <br />place in year 3, it might score a five. If it is not mandated at A system which <br />supports compliance that has reached end of life or must be repl <br />as a new law and afforded a score of 10. <br /> <br />2.Citizen Service Improvement: 20% <br />Any project that provides our citizens with a new service or way <br />County is considered a Citizen Service Improvement. If the serv <br />represents significant improvements, it will be weighted the sam <br />Weight: Improvements such as creating a new web application for citizens <br />with the County might score a 10. A significant improvement in to an existing application might <br />score a 7. A process improvement for a department may only score <br />externally focused but improves on a process, it may score a 3. <br />3.Positive Financial Impact 25% <br />This is as much determined by the financial impact as it is by t <br />a specified period of time. A project that creates revenue or s <br />process is considered to have positive financial impact. <br /> <br />Weight: A new revenue source that also provides citizens a convenience, <br />payment, might score a 10. A change to an existing business proc <br />might score an 8. ROI and time required to recover the investme <br />area. If a payback of less than 12 months is planned, it may sc <br />would score a 5, and no anticipated payback period may score a 0 <br />shall be considered the same as a new revenue source, for purpos <br />of ROI. <br />4.Alignment with Comprehensive Plan or Commissioners Goals: <br />10% <br />The ideal score would be for an IT Project submission to have a <br />defined as a County Commissioners Strategic Goal or County . <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.