Browse
Search
Minutes - 20080225
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20080225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 12:12:14 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:58:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c2a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c2b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Governed by Proposed Architectural Review Board and Design Elements to Ensure ALL <br /> Development will be Consistent and Unified <br /> JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING <br /> Development Plans to be Considered for Approval When Plans Do Not: <br /> 1. Meet Criteria for Site Plan Approval listed in Article 14.3 <br /> 2. Address Agency Comments Solicited during the Site Plan Review Process; and/or <br /> 3. Adhere to the Design Standards applicable within EDD's as set forth in Article 6.29 of <br /> the ordinance. <br /> And which Propose a "Design Solution" equal to or better than the Design Manual. <br /> -- 7.21 PD-ED <br /> Due to `Master Plan' Concept and Nature of Project, Development Plans Can Not: <br /> 1. Provide Specificity& Detail required in Article 14.3 <br /> 2. Address Agency Comments because Comments are Limited Until further Detail is <br /> provided, Which will come as the Planned Development transitions into Site Plans & Site <br /> Development. <br /> 3. Adhere to ALL Design standards in the EDD Manual <br /> And have Proposed I Provided 14 "Design Solutions" from the Existing 90 and currently noted <br /> as "Waivers/Value Substitutes" to Allow for an More Efficient & Higher Quality End Product <br /> Within a PD no use shall be permitted except pursuant to a Special Use Permit <br /> authorized by the County Commissioners which shall specify the use or uses <br /> authorized " <br /> — Orange Co. Zoning Ordinance, Sec 7.2.5 <br /> Bill Hutchins, Attorney representative of the applicant, continued at this point. <br /> Bill Hutchins: If there's no objection, I'm going to call several witnesses from several <br /> professional groups that have helped in this project, ask them to state their names and <br /> qualifications, and I'll encourage all of the witnesses to be as brief as you can. If there's no <br /> objection, I'd like to call Mr. Tracy Parrott. <br /> Tracy Parrott: I'm the Civil Site Manager for Summit Consulting in Hillsborough, and I'm a <br /> licensed professional engineer in North Carolina and have roughly 19 years experience in civil <br /> engineering and construction, both in the private and public sector. I've worked a number of <br /> years with the North Carolina Department of Transportation. I am hear to speak about the <br /> special use permit process. As indicated earlier by Mr. Benedict, there are two actions required <br /> here, and I'm speaking to the special use permit process. He continued with the PowerPoint. <br /> SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br /> CIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIPAIII SPECIAL USE REQUIREMENTS <br /> If Located Where Proposed and Developed According to Plans Submitted, the Special Use <br /> Will: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.