Orange County NC Website
85. Yes, there are 84,000+ people on the highway going south and north, but they're not all <br /> getting off the exit at the same time. There are already traffic issues. I can't get out of my <br /> driveway if I wait after 11:00 on Saturday and Sunday. I have to wait 20-30 minutes to exit out <br /> of my driveway as it is. If this development comes in, it might be longer than that. During busy <br /> shopping season, Thanksgiving and Christmas, I'd have to stay in my house all day long. The <br /> truck stop is already enough traffic. The flea market is too much traffic. There is a taco stand <br /> across the street from my house that causes chaos early in the morning. There's loud music <br /> early in the morning until late afternoon. I do not have peace and quiet now. If this <br /> development comes in, it will be worse than what it already is now. Like I said, to touch on the <br /> weighing station; the weighing station is right there going northbound if you get on the interstate. <br /> Saturdays and Sundays there's already problems that the trucks have to merge to get in the <br /> weighing station. No one touched on how that's going to back up Buckhorn and 70 from both <br /> ends from people trying to get on northbound 85. <br /> Tom Darnell: I'm an Orange County landowner. I have two questions and one comment. The <br /> gentleman mentioned a national, unnamed tenant. What if they lose the tenant? Do they lose <br /> the budget? Would all of this work be in vain? The second thing, there was an amendment, I <br /> got this on the internet, they added a couple of acres, which an acre and a half of it adjoins my <br /> property and it's on the east side of Buckhorn. What are they going to do if it wasn't addressed? <br /> The acre and a half that was not even mentioned, but it's going to be zoned the same as the <br /> west side, and it absolutely adjoins my property. That affects me, and I don't mind it, I just <br /> would like to know what their intentions are with that property. The third thing that wasn't <br /> addressed when the firemen were here —they're asking for six-story buildings. A five-story <br /> building is as far as a ground ladder will go. They'll need a ladder truck and you're going to <br /> have to come up with about $1 million for a ladder truck. Some company, either Mebane or <br /> Efland is going to have to maintain that ladder truck. I don't know if anyone has thought about <br /> that. If they donate a place for a fire station, well that's the place it needs to be. The last <br /> comment is that I've owned the land for ten years or so, but since 1981 or so, you or your <br /> predecessors have worked diligently to put approximately 600 or 900 acres in an EDD and told <br /> everybody that it's going to be economic development. If not these guys, next week there will <br /> be somebody else. This is not going to stop. Basically, I'm for it, because the next one will be <br /> right down the street. If they leave and don't get the approval, six months from now we'll be <br /> back in here for another go. So, you can control with all your rules and regulations and come up <br /> with something good, but they are coming because you've already told them, "Here's our EDD." <br /> Chair Jacobs: Can someone answer the question about the property adjoining Mr. Darnell's. <br /> Jim Parker: I believe the property he is referring to is a piece of property that resides on the <br /> west side and the east side of Buckhorn Road and is not two separate parcels; it is one parcel <br /> that is connected. The portion of that parcel on the west side, which is shaped somewhat like <br /> an "L", we anticipate that that will be used for access in some form or fashion to Rabbit Drive <br /> and/or the Petro. <br /> Chair Jacobs: I don't know if you can or want to answer the question about what happens if <br /> you don't get the anchor tenant. <br /> Jim Parker: We keep trying. That's my answer. <br /> End of public comment. <br />