Browse
Search
Minutes - 20080225
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20080225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 12:12:14 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:58:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c2a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
Agenda - 02-25-2008-c2b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-25-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
economies as opposed to importing big guys. I was deeply impressed by the quality of your <br /> presentation, particularly along the sustainability lines; I think his four suggestions or <br /> modifications to encourage the local businesses would make a big difference. I previously <br /> submitted a document that has a summary of my concerns, plus some of the evidence. So I <br /> hope that will get into your packet. I would say that I see Buckhorn as an important issue <br /> because it highlights the tough choices we're facing as how to best build long-term economic <br /> vitality for all regions of Orange County and all its constituencies, both rural and town. The <br /> question for me is less how many shoppers are we going to get into Orange County, but how <br /> many kinds of things is Orange County going to be producing, what kind of services we're going <br /> to be adding that we can sell to other people and exchange among ourselves. I am very <br /> impressed with how thoughtfully this project has been developed and researched, but I also <br /> have to say that, unfortunately, there is good reason to believe that this research is based on an <br /> economic development model that is in the process of failing nationally and globally, and <br /> certainly at locations across this country. I see it as a terrible mistake to try to apply it here, <br /> especially in light of the increasing problems of peak oil, of drought, and of global warming. So, <br /> the evidence, as I see it, suggests that Buckhorn Village is likely to do more economic harm <br /> than good. Current economic theory places a huge emphasis on GDP growth and the large <br /> corporation and development projects that increase it most. About 30 years ago this emphasis <br /> spawned an economic development strategy that has been irreverently named "The Big Game <br /> Hunting Project." That is, using incentives to lure big manufacturers, retailers, and other large <br /> corporations, which officials hope will bring in jobs and tax revenues. Unfortunately, while this <br /> strategy may increase tax revenues in the short-term, research shows that it erodes the <br /> surrounding local economic networks, siphons away local dollars, and costs more in tax dollars <br /> infrastructure overhead, increased pollution, and lost jobs than the local businesses that it <br /> destroys. Unless we can make allowances for creating local enterprise networks I suspect that <br /> Buckhorn is less an advantage than a detriment. <br /> Bill Bunch: I have been sworn in. I'm here tonight as a resident of Orange County and also as <br /> a Certified Public Accountant and a local business owner. I'm also Chair of the Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro Chamber of Commerce. I'd like to applaud the Commissioners for your foresight in <br /> putting an economic development district right beside a major transportation artery many years <br /> ago. The projected sales tax revenue, $5 or $6 million, from this project will materially increase <br /> the County sales tax base. And the projected $125 million in commercial property value will <br /> materially increase the projected property tax revenue. These funds can be used to pay for <br /> school teachers. There is significant pressure from the two school boards for the County to fund <br /> schools at a regional level, and this project would bring more revenue that would fund a lot of <br /> school teachers. We're using local developers, and I applaud Buckhorn Associates. The <br /> project is being developed by some of the best and brightest developers in the area who are <br /> sensitive to the culture and desires of the citizens, they have experience doing very high-quality <br /> mixed-use projects. This isn't outside developers coming into town, these are our local Orange <br /> County developers, and we support that. We encourage proactive collaboration with the County <br /> and also the local neighbors —with Efland, with Mebane, with the Town of Chapel Hill, with <br /> Carrboro, with Hillsborough, the Hillsborough Chamber of Commerce, and the Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro Chamber of Commerce. We think that if we work together and collaborate, we can <br /> attract the type of local business that will be the right mix for our community. On behalf of the <br /> 950 members of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, we enthusiastically endorse <br /> this project. <br /> Jim Stock: I have been sworn in. I am a Carrboro resident. I own a small business that would <br /> in all likelihood benefit financially from a large-scale commercial development at Buckhorn, yet I <br /> am almost appalled that the vision for the future of Orange County is a mall. This is not why we <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.