Minutes - 20080212 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

justice is a tough issue to deal with and it is so broad. The HRC thinks that, "The aim of social justice is full and equal participation of all groups in a society designed and mutually shaped to meet their needs." He said that the report includes certain particular areas of social justice that were discovered in the research that was done over several years. Vivette Jeffries-Logan listed the categories for social justice ranked in descending order, based on the amount of money allotted to each category by Orange County residents. Approximately 550 residents spent $7,169.02 on social justice at different listening sessions across the County using the Pennies in a Jar Tool. These are listed on page 8 of the report. 1. Elimination of Oppression 2. Economic Self-Sufficiency (incoming wealth, health care, and housing) 3. Physically and Mentally Safe Communities 4. Environmental Justice 5. Civic Participation (voting) 6. Other (tax relief, transportation, reproductive justice, animal protection, and taking money from the rich to give to the poor) Bryant Colson explained the Pennies in a Jar, where each citizen was allotted 13 Orange dollars, and was asked to allocate the dollars to the five areas of social justice. There were three public listening sessions, and the advisory boards were also solicited for opinions. People were also questioned at University Mall and Hog Day. Bill Hendrickson read from the Memo of Transmittal that, The enclosed report proposes to achieve social justice in Orange County and the County shall perform government duties including policy-making and budgeting..." He said that the County Commissioners are the implementers and budgeters, and the HRC includes just the advisory people. He said that the County Commissioners would be congratulated for initiating the first justice goal for any county in the whole country. Bryant Colson added that, during this process, the commission learned a lot about Orange County's residents and one another. He said that he has a newfound respect and appreciation for his colleagues through this process. Commissioner Carey asked how the HRC came up with the five categories. James Spivey said that there were lots of subcommittee meetings and brainstorming. He made reference to page 20, and the summary of the topics. Barbara Chapman said that the first step was to educate themselves after they were asked to do this report. Staff put together a workshop for the HRC on Overcoming Oppression, which was very challenging. There was also a subcommittee that brainstormed ideas. She said that they tried to make it as inclusive as possible, but manageable in terms of people understanding categories. Shoshannah Smith made reference to page 28 and the list of events/groups solicitations of ideas. Jack Vogt said that he came in at a later stage in this process and he looked at it quite critically. He said that the core of it is on page 10 and the Social Justice Vision. He said that he had some difficulty with the term, "oppression," and he would prefer "discrimination." He thinks the report is as good a statement of social justice that he has seen. He does have some questions about some of the costs of the recommendations and who should bear them. He said that the recommendations are meant to highlight what the general point means. Bill Hendrickson said that this goal is now on the table and he does not want it to gather dust. The HRC would like it to remain a living creature.