Browse
Search
Minutes - 20080211 - Transfer Station
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20080211 - Transfer Station
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 1:50:31 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/11/2008
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-11-2008- Transfer Station
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-11-2008
Agenda - 02-11-2008-e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-11-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and weighted. Bob Sallach said that he suggested the carbon footprint could be a technical <br /> criteria. <br /> Bob Sallach reviewed the exclusionary criteria and said that the proposed criteria would <br /> exclude sites less than 25 acres, sites more than a 3-mile radius of a transportation arterial or <br /> rail line, and possibly sites within the protected watersheds. <br /> The Board agreed. <br /> Bob Sallach said that on February 19th, there will be public comment on this and then <br /> there would be a decision on March 18th. The Board agreed with this timeline. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she did agree with Commissioner Nelson, in that if there <br /> is another jurisdiction that had a possible partnership site and the other one is not interested, <br /> then it should be taken off. <br /> Laura Blackmon said that the towns will have to pay for hauling and they may want to <br /> partner. <br /> 5. Discussion, Feedback, and Direction on Technical Criteria (Exhibit 7) <br /> TECHNICAL CRITERIA <br /> • Central Location to Collection Routes <br /> • Access to Major Transportation Routes <br /> • Site Size Requirements <br /> • Sufficient Space for Onsite Roadways, Queuing, and Parking <br /> • Truck and Traffic Compatibility <br /> • Ability for Expansion <br /> • Space for Recycling, Composting, and Public Education <br /> • Buffer Space <br /> • Gently Sloping Topography <br /> • Access to Utilities <br /> • Zoning Designations and Requirements <br /> • Carbon Footprint Impact <br /> Bob Sallach made reference to the site size and said that the transfer of waste to a larger <br /> vehicle to enable disposal affects the size of the site. He said that the key factors of the site <br /> size are the entry and exit to the site. Queuing of parking is also an issue. There are two forms <br /> of queuing —the ability to stage transfer vehicles and the ability to stage incoming collection <br /> vehicles. There also has to be employee parking and accommodation of vehicles on site. He <br /> suggested a counterclockwise formation. <br /> He continued to review the technical criteria as listed above. <br /> He made reference to the Buffer Space criterion and said that the type of transfer station <br /> that is being considered is totally enclosed. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to the Gently Sloping Topography criterion and <br /> said that steep slopes should probably be eliminated. Bob Sallach agreed. Commissioner <br /> Gordon suggested having a category for topography and then having a preference stated within <br /> it that eliminates steep slopes. Bob Sallach said that this could be factored in as part of the <br /> weighting factors. <br /> Bob Sallach asked for any other criterion from the Board. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked how the costs were factored in. Bob Sallach suggested <br /> putting the costs under community-specific criteria. <br /> Commissioner Carey said that as weighting criteria is applied to this list, costs will be at <br /> least subjectively factored in. <br /> 6. Public Comment Period (15 Minutes) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.