Browse
Search
ORD-2000-005 Text Amendments to Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2000
>
ORD-2000-005 Text Amendments to Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 10:36:05 AM
Creation date
12/10/2012 3:58:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2000
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C1
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 02-28-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was amended to reflect the changes as described above. <br /> d. (non-Vehicular Access) <br /> This item has to do with a non-vehicular access line. This also can be used in residential and <br /> non-residential subdivisions so that when the subdivisions are prepared the approved access points can be <br /> put on the subdivision plat. <br /> e. Section II DEFINITIONS <br /> When lots are subdivided, very often the access points are changed to a road that should not <br /> have additional traffic. The amendment would not allow someone to shift the access point to burden the <br /> roads that are not scheduled for a higher capacity system. <br /> Appendix A Orange County Private Road Standards <br /> Craig Benedict made reference to private road standards and said that the staff is suggesting a <br /> decrease in the amount of lots that are allowed on a private road from a 25-lot maximum to a 10-lot <br /> maximum. He described the negative things that have occurred as a result of the 25-lot maximum regulation <br /> for private roads. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to the Orange County private road standards and asked <br /> what would happen to existing private roads if someone wanted to put a house on an existing lot or split the <br /> lot into two lots. <br /> Craig Benedict said that each of the subdivisions that have private road standards has <br /> something in their homeowner's association documents that address additional lots being subdivided on the <br /> road. In some cases,the cost is borne by the subdivision. <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill said that the upgrade of the road is required to service the new subdivided lots. <br /> Once the upgrade is done, then all of the lots in the subdivision are jointly responsible for maintaining the <br /> road to the upgraded standard. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the 18-foot travel way and asked if that included the <br /> swells or if it was just the actual road surface. <br /> Craig Benedict said that 18 feet was just the actual road surface and that the impermeability that <br /> comes forward from both public and private roads still is counted as the entire roadway. After the swell goes <br /> up to the 50-foot area,then there is a certain amount of impervious that would be counted in the remaining <br /> 50 feet. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if it was the same amount of shoulder that must be cleared <br /> regardless of whether it is a public or private road. <br /> Craig Benedict said that typically there is the surface course, a four-foot swell down and a four- <br /> foot swell up and then whatever can be preserved after that. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 13 and read the first paragraph which says, <br /> "Private roads serving more than 10 lots or dwelling units may be permitted only if constructed to NCDOT <br /> public road standards,"and said that this contradicts everything which has gone before it. <br /> Craig Benedict said that this statement could be deleted. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Class A versus Class B private roads and asked if the <br /> staff has looked into the cost of hiring a professional engineer. <br /> Craig Benedict said that the staff has checked into the costs for engineers and the determination <br /> of one road over the other is negligible in cost because it is the engineer's time to go out and see if the road <br /> meets the standards. He said that one of the most important things is if the County is going to continue to <br /> have private roadways, the hazards of living on a private road should be reduced as much as possible by <br /> having the road certified to the standards. He said that drainage is the key for private roads, and that is <br /> where the biggest failing is. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that DOT had set up a committee to work on subdivision standards <br /> and he is concerned that the County is locking themselves in and not allowing any flexibility. He is <br /> concerned that there would be no allowance if there were some significant natural resource or rural <br /> characteristic of the property that might be enhanced by having a private road as opposed to a public road. <br /> He questions eliminating flexibility in the concept plan amendments. He would prefer that the plan be <br /> presented for comment to the Planning Board and the County Commissioners before the staff makes a <br /> ruling. <br /> Craig Benedict said that some of the language could be changed to allow for some flexibility. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to have incentives for people to do things the way <br /> the County would want them to, not making it as a right, but a privilege. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked if the Planning staff could specify the reasons for modifications of <br /> the regulations. <br /> Craig Benedict said that a checklist could be implemented and reviewed to be sure the private <br /> road standards meet the goals of the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> Commissioner Brown said that she would like the consumer,the one buying the lots,to be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.