Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
4 <br />Certificate of Occupancy. The County Attorney, through discussions with the <br />attorneys for Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Hillsborough, and a review of the recent <br />Supreme Court decision in Lanvale Properties v. Cabarrus County, which struck <br />down as unauthorized by law Cabarrus County’s adequate public facilities ordinance, <br />has determined that the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance should be <br />amended. <br /> <br />2.Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the Planning <br />Director is required to: ‘cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based <br />upon that analysis, prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning <br />Board and the Board of County Commissioners’.The required analysis for the UDO <br />text amendment will be available prior to the public hearing. <br />3.Comprehensive Plan Linkage (i.e. Principles, Goals and Objectives) <br />The Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinanceis addressed on page 8-42 of the <br />Comprehensive Plan.Objective E-1 also pertains to the SAPFO. <br />4.New Statutes and Rules <br />Lanvale Properties, LLC and Cabarrus County Building Industry Association v. <br />County of Cabarrus and City of Locust, 731 S.E. 2d 800 (2012). <br />C. PROCESS <br />1.TIMEFRAME/MILESTONES/DEADLINES <br />a.BOCC Authorization to Proceed <br />December 11, 2012 <br />b.Quarterly Public Hearing <br />February 25,2013 <br />c. BOCC Updates/Checkpoints <br />February 5, 2013 –Approval of legal ad <br />April 9,2013–receive Planning Board recommendation <br />d.Other <br /> <br />2.PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br />Mission/Scope: <br />Public Hearing process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br />Orange County ordinance requirements <br />2 <br /> <br />