Browse
Search
Minutes 10-09-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 10-09-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:11:12 AM
Creation date
12/4/2012 2:42:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-09-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-09-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 10-09-2012 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-09-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 10-09-2012 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-09-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 10-09-2012 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-09-2012 - Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and whatever comes up from the Planning Board will include what the OUT Board <br /> recommended. He does not think that the County Commissioners need to get a separate <br /> recommendation. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that if the County Commissioners asked for it, then it will see it <br /> through the Planning Board. She thinks that this will be taken care of. <br /> The Board agreed with adding "bicycle and pedestrian" to the first item under Goals <br /> and Objectives. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to #6, "serve as an advisory body to the <br /> Administrative Staff of the Orange Public Transit system." She said that it is strange to have <br /> an advisory board of the County Commissioners be an advisor to the staff. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that it was agreed that it would be folded into the OUT Board, which <br /> would serve as advice to the staff because they were dealing with transportation. <br /> Darcy Zorio said that NCDOT requires that Orange Public Transportation have a <br /> transportation advisory board as a recipient of subgrades. DOT also requires that the <br /> transportation advisory board have specific membership. At this time, the board does not <br /> address the issues required by the state statutes. She said that the OUT Board needs to keep <br /> its goals and objectives "clean" and satisfy the DOT requirements. There are some <br /> membership issues on the TAB that might not be pertinent to the OUT Board. <br /> Chair Pelissier made reference to page 4 where it says that there would be three <br /> members from the advisory boards having transportation interests — Commission for the <br /> Environment, Economic Development Commission, and Planning Board. She said that her <br /> concern is that when there are these requirements it means that people have to be on two <br /> boards. She is hearing that this is problematic and that it does not work very well. She knows <br /> that there should be communication between two different boards, but maybe the staff people <br /> can summarize pertinent issues. She questioned having this as a stipulation of inembership. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that the Commission for the Environment might have an <br /> interest, but she is not sure about the Economic Development Commission. There is an <br /> overlap between planning and transportation. <br /> Chair Pelissier suggested not requiring this, but maybe having someone with specific <br /> interests or expertise on the OUT Board. <br /> Commissioner Gordon suggested asking the boards how they felt about it. <br /> Frank Clifton said that the commonality with all of these boards is that the County staff <br /> supports them all. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz suggested saying, "six at-large members with expertise or <br /> specific interests in the environment, economic development, planning, bicycle transportation, <br /> pedestrian access and safety, and public transit." <br /> After discussion, the Board decided to remove item B-4 regarding the staggered terms. <br /> Aqricultural Preservation <br /> Rich Shaw is staff support for this board. He said that Objective B-2 should be divided <br /> up and bulleted. <br /> John Roberts made reference to Section IV, B, #4 and said to delete this statement <br /> about quorum. <br /> Animal Services <br /> John Roberts said that the current date and time was included, but it somehow got <br /> deleted from this one. He suggested that the current meeting dates and times should be <br /> included. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.