Orange County NC Website
weaknesses, the Board could be held accountable. It is important to be aware of such <br />situations and to make sure that these issues are addressed as soon as possible. <br />Commissioner Foushee said that it seems that the small Finance staff may need <br />to increase and Ken Chavious said that the mere changes in the accounting itself <br />implies that there will be a need to add additional staff. The department has <br />decentralized a lot of the processes to become more efficient, but the time is coming to <br />add more staff, such as an internal auditor, and to create an audit committee, consisting <br />of a Board member, an external representative, and staff. <br />Doug Beelendorf said that his firm supports the idea of an audit committee. <br />2. Preliminary Fiscal Outlook -Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Beyond <br />Laura Blackmon said that in past years this has been done in early winter but, <br />but staff is working through the capital budget and will be making a presentation soon. <br />This is a good time to talk about the fiscal outlook for next year and the budget drivers. <br />Budget Director Donna Coffey said that the staff thought it would be a good idea <br />to talk about the budget drivers earlier this year. She made reference to the blue booklet <br />with graphs. She said that this time last year she never would have predicted that the <br />State would do what it did this past summer. She said that whatever is said tonight <br />might change significantly by the time the General Assembly is done next summer. <br />Graph #1: Since 1998-99, Orange County has had an average annual <br />percentage increase of 7.4% on expenditures. This equates to an $8.8 million average <br />annual increase in the budget. In 1998, the budget was $93 million, and this year it is <br />$173 million. <br />Graph #2: This graph shows the dedication of the Board of County <br />Commissioners to address education needs of the County. The Board has historically <br />surpassed its funding target of 48.1 °~ of the total general fund going to the school <br />systems. <br />Graph #3: There is consistent growth in current expense expenditures going to <br />schools (blue part of the bar graph). There has been a growth in debt service for the <br />schools also (yellow part of the bar graph). Also, in the last couple of years, the fair <br />funding reserve was put in place. The total funding for CHCCS and OCS is $85 million. <br />Graph #4: There has been steady growth in per pupil funding, going from <br />$2,040 in 1998-99 to $3,919 this year. This averages out to be just over 5°lo growth <br />every year. <br />Graph #5: If the trend with the per-pupil funding continues, it will cast $8.4 <br />million just in current expense to fund the projected number of students. The student <br />membership is anticipated to continue increasing. This year, the OCS has experienced <br />a large increase in the number of elementary students, the majority of which are coming <br />from the Mebane area. <br />Graph #6: The Board approved a plan last February to issue debt, and $52 <br />million was issued in the spring. The other plans that the Board agreed to were to debt <br />finance the animal shelter. There is still $6.9 million in 2001 bonds that has not been <br />sold, and the Gateway Campus has not been financed. The debt service for these is <br />included in the debt projection numbers. The peak for debt service will be 2008-09. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the comparison of debt for the County <br />projects versus the schools and Donna Coffey said that for 2008-09, it is $20 million for <br />the schools and $6.5 million for the County. <br />Graph #7: This includes preliminary projections of anticipated funding needs. <br />Based on the assumption that the County's general fund has increased an average of <br />7.4°~ annually over the last ten years, by the year 2012-13, the expenditures will be at <br />$248 million. <br />