Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - AOG Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-06-2012 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 2:38:23 PM
Creation date
11/30/2012 11:15:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/6/2012
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 12-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
66 <br /> irrtemal iransaction, as long as the County has the asset, it is not quite so importarrt as to which pocket the money is <br /> coming from. <br /> Chair Carey said that the 60 acres would be a solid waste assef and if it were used for anofher purpose <br /> the appropriate transfer would have to be made to fhe landfifl.fund. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs feels the CouMy needs to leave some ability to do something ather than protect the <br /> 60 acres for future Commissioners. He said that if the 60 acres were going to be put in open space permaner�tfy, . <br /> Orange Counfy wouid need to do it with the understanding that they would pay the solid waste operation for the land. <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis feets that the Courity has already lost the possibif'�t�r of interconnecting three tracts <br /> of land and looking at the passibitity of estabfishing a mega-park. He nrtade reference to a letter that was in the Chapel <br /> Hill Herald today that suggested that the Counfy sell the Greene Tract and put the money in the landfill fund. He thinks <br /> there is an opportunity to make a statement for the future and keep the best piece of land as an asset and then figure <br /> out what is in the best irrterest of the cit¢ens. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she prefers altemative#1. She said that her vision for the Greene Tract <br /> is that it would remain undisturbed. She proposed that the Coutny pursue obtaining coritiguous property. She wants <br /> the County to be interested in delineating the natural areas. She indicated on the map the locafion of the natural <br /> areas. She said that theoreticalfy the land is an asset of the landfill. She asked about the Duke Power restricfions on <br /> the easemenf. She also_asked how much land the County would need to have access to the railroad. She said that <br /> her vision for the Greene Tract is that it would be mainly open space. She would like the staff tfl research what the ' <br /> restricEive covenants are for the residences,what the Greene Tract buffers mean,and what would the other <br /> jurisdictions do with the property adjacent to the railroad tracks. <br /> Chair Carey feets that attemative one does provide some potential for the area for both development and � <br /> protection. He feels that because the 60 acres is an asset of the system that some opportuniEies should be preserved <br /> for it to be used for developable purposes. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked how much is designated along the railroad and David Stancil said between <br /> 500�00 feet She asked what it could be used for and John Link said that he would think that any structure would be <br /> accornmodated. She suggested having an altemative access in the northem part of the tract where the Duke Power <br /> easernent would not have to be crossed. � � <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill said that someone could be employed to determine the needs of access ta the railroad. <br /> He said that since there are so many unknowns associated with the raifroad,the County should focus on physically <br /> rnaking a connection to the railroad right-of-way. � <br /> Chair Carey said that the County could exclude a right-of�nray from the 60 acres and negofiate with the. <br /> towns for using it for that purpose as a part of the 109 acres without having to assume responsibility for it as an asset <br /> Chair Carey supports altemative#1 because it provides ma�dmum fle�obility for the use of this property. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked about the buffers from the Neville Tract <br /> Gayle Wilson said that in changing the Neville Tract to allow excavafiion of soil,the Town required a buffer. � <br /> The landfil(required a certain amount of soil to come off the property, and it was determined that since most of the <br /> property would have to be used for soil excavation,that the buffier was placed on the adjacent property,which was the <br /> Greene Tract. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Brown,seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to adopt altemative#1 <br /> and send on to Chapel Hill the following: 1)the wildlife corridor map, showing and highfighting the various natural <br /> areas with an explanation;2)the goldenrod sheet showing the drainage pattem and what it rneans in terms of a <br /> natura(area being the headwaters of the creeks; and 3)a statement of support of Chape(HifPs resolution to maintain <br /> the Greene Tract in a natural sta#e to ii�e greatest exEer�t possible,since there has been a mention of affordable . <br /> housing. The County's interrt is to preserve the propetiy in its natural state and build on the support of the Chapel Hill <br /> resofution. <br /> OTE: UNANIMOUS � <br /> .__._--- <br /> Chair Carey will circulafe e letter to the other Commissioners before it is sent to Chapel Hilt. <br /> With regard to the resolution added to the agenda, Geoffrey Gledhill said that the application for rezoning <br /> is still out there and pending and it will be processed if there is no formal action to withdraw the appfica6on for the � <br /> rezoning. By this resolution, Orange County as an owner of the properiy will withdraw their support for rezoning the <br /> Greene Tract <br /> A mation was made by Commissioner Jacobs,seconded by Gommissioner Halkiotis to withdraw Orange <br /> County's support of the rezoning request of the Greene Tract. . <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> �—'"� c. Adotstion of Countv CaRital Proiect Ordinances <br /> The Board was to consider adoption of capital project ordinances for projects included in the 1999-2009 <br /> Capital Investment Pfan. This item was postponed to the March 23,2000 work session. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.