Orange County NC Website
Attachment B 9 <br /> Memorandum <br /> To: Board of County Commissioners <br /> From: Jan Sassaman, Chair <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> Subject: SWAB Interlocal Agreement and Alternative Technology <br /> Framework/Timeline Recommendation <br /> Date: November 11, 2010 <br /> The Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB)has been discussing issues concerning the <br /> future of the Interlocal Agreement (IA) as well as a possible response to the Alternative <br /> Technology Timeline and framework request made by the BOCC in item 4 of its motion, <br /> adopted December 2009, to utilize the City of Durham transfer station as a disposal site <br /> when the Orange County-owned landfill ceases to accept waste. <br /> At the SWAB's November 2010 meeting, general consensus was reached on a number of <br /> points that are presented below. These issues will probably be further discussed at the <br /> December SWAB meeting. In addition, the SWAB has identified those elements that we <br /> believe should be incorporated/included in any new Interlocal Agreement for Solid Waste <br /> Management for Orange County. <br /> Key Points from SWAB <br /> • Discussions on revising the current IA should proceed at a higher political and <br /> managerial level than the SWAB. We believe that a group of representatives <br /> from the four jurisdictions should be formed immediately to begin active <br /> discussions on the political and functional possibility of a future partnership for <br /> local solid waste management. These discussions could even consider the notion <br /> of a public solid waste authority. The SWAB feels strongly that the <br /> organizational issue and what the governments will do with their waste during and <br /> following a possible 3-5 year interim period following landfill closure are <br /> inextricably related and need to be addressed with all due haste. <br /> • The governing bodies should move deliberately as the 3-5 year period will pass <br /> very quickly and a goal of not only deciding what to do and how to do it, but of <br /> actually implementing a solution, would be in our mutual best economic and <br /> environmental interests. In fact, with staff continually endeavoring to extend the <br /> life of the landfill, a timely organizational and operational resolution could avoid <br /> or at least limit the interim option and related expense of hauling to the City of <br /> Durham. In other words, the process for post-Durham transfer station waste <br /> management should begin immediately, along with the organizational discussion. <br />