Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-2012 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 12-03-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-03-2012 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 12:18:49 PM
Creation date
11/30/2012 9:56:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 12-03-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> 1 3. Discussion on Fire Protection Aqreements between Fire Departments and the <br /> 2 County <br /> 3 Commissioner Hemminger asked if there would be two separate contracts — ones that co- <br /> 4 locate and ones that do not. <br /> 5 Michael Talbert said that they are working on one contract to co-locate an ambulance at <br /> 6 an existing fire station. The other contract will be for fire protection, rescue, and first responder <br /> 7 with all fire departments. He would see these as two separate contracts. <br /> 8 Chapel Hill Fire Chief Dan Jones said that the easiest way to do this is to come up with <br /> 9 standard language and standard clauses. <br /> 10 SORS Chief Matthew Mauzy said that this can be done on one inclusive document with <br /> 11 check boxes for the services that each franchise provides. He agreed that the co-location is <br /> 12 one document and the provision of services is another document. <br /> 13 Commissioner Yuhasz said that he wants to make sure they do not end up with 11 <br /> 14 different contracts. <br /> 15 Commissioner Gordon made reference to the North Chatham, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro <br /> 16 contracts and these have been cancelled. She said that she is not sure they should wait until <br /> 17 the Orange Rural contract is finished because there may be some concerns. She wants an <br /> 18 update on the contract process with these three departments. <br /> 19 Michael Talbert said that the proposed contract with Orange Rural is the co-location of <br /> 20 one ambulance and not a contract for fire protection. This is a separate contract for the three <br /> 21 departments of North Chatham, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro. He said that staff will be coming <br /> 22 back to the Emergency Services Work Group on October 16th with a recommendation for the <br /> 23 work group to consider. If the work group endorses the plan, staff will continue meeting with <br /> 24 the state, management, the Boards of the entities, and will schedule a work session between <br /> 25 now and the end of the year with the idea that if it all works out there could be action as early as <br /> 26 the first meeting in January. This would be early enough for the changes that need to be made. <br /> 27 The first step is the work group endorsing this. <br /> 28 Commissioner McKee said that the 112 homes that were a Class 10 rating was the driver <br /> 29 in this issue. These homes were at risk of extreme increases in their insurance or no <br /> 30 insurance. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Michael Talbert said that he distributed a newer contract tonight for the three <br /> 33 departments. There must be new contracts in place by July 1, 2013. He went through the <br /> 34 North Chatham contract. The first page is similar to the 1992 contracts. <br /> 35 The changes come on #3. Chatham County spells out the correction percentage they <br /> 36 anticipate on the taxes and how they are going to pay the departments at the first of the month <br /> 37 following the collections. The County currently pays once a quarter, so it would be a change. <br /> 38 Item #4 says, "shall provide adequate fire protection services and will provide necessary <br /> 39 equipment personnel and other resources as determined by the North Carolina Department of <br /> 40 Insurance." It goes on to say that, "the district will maintain at least a rating of 9s." This puts <br /> 41 the burden on the fire department to maintain that rating. It goes further to define rescue and <br /> 42 first responder, and fire is already defined by the state statute. <br /> 43 Item #7, the contract with North Chatham calls for an annual audit by a certified public <br /> 44 accountant, which is then turned in to the County Commissioners by December 1St of the next <br /> 45 year. The County's contracts do not currently call for an audit. <br /> 46 Item #10, in the event that the fire department is dissolved for any reason, it spells out <br /> 47 how the assets of that fire department would be distributed, where they would go, and how they <br /> 48 would be used within the existing district. This is not currently part of the County's contract. <br /> 49 Item #11 is completely new and goes into the idea of hold harmless and insurance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.