Orange County NC Website
Commissioners. When Ken Thompson arrived in town in 1981, there was not enough money to <br />pay the bills from July to December, when the tax money came in. He said that Ken Thompson <br />created an 11-point plan, which was nothing more than robbing Peter to pay Paul. He said that in <br />1983 when he served on the Board of County Commissioners, the County was still short of money <br />to provide needs. At this time, he contacted the North Carolina Department of Commerce, and <br />three people visited with him. He took the representatives around the County, and he was told <br />that with US 7011-85/Southern Railway corridor through Orange County, that this was the most <br />potential area in the State far goad, clean, low-water using, non-polluting, high-paying economic <br />growth that would provide bath jobs and money for Orange County. He was also told that due to <br />the lack of interest in cooperation from Orange County in the 15 years prior to that, when <br />economic development interests came to Raleigh, that Orange County was marked off the list. <br />He said that less than 90 days ago, he spoke with an individual involved in economic development <br />in the State, who has been working in this position for about a year. When this individual took this <br />job, he was told by his superiors not to waste his time in Orange County because they do not want <br />anything there. He said that after four years since the Economic Development Commission was <br />created, there has not been one brick laid within this economic development corridor. He owns <br />property within this corridor. He said that two and a half years ago, the County Commissioners, <br />along with the Economic Development Department, committed that by June 2010, 5,000 new <br />commercial jobs and $45 million of new commercial tax base would be created. Nothing has <br />happened yet. He said that it was reported in the State of the County meeting in the spring that <br />there had been 915 new commercial jobs created and $45 million in new commercial tax base. <br />He found out later that this was not true, but that it was referring to Meadowmont. He said that the <br />developer of Meadowmont told him that Orange County had nothing to do with this growth. He <br />said that I-85 runs through Durham, Orange, and Alamance Counties, and in the past 20 months, <br />Durham County has created in excess of 2,500 new commercial jobs and has added $545 million <br />of new commercial tax base. Alamance County has created some $200-300 million in new <br />commercial tax base and hundreds of jobs. Orange County property tax has increased 524°~ in <br />the last 20 years. The property tax has increased every year for 19 straight years. He said that <br />Orange County has an image that has to be overcome. He asked the County Commissioners <br />what they intended to do about it. <br />Sam Lasris lives in Cedar Grove. He spoke on behalf of the Orange Unified <br />Transportation Board. He said that it has come to the attention of the OUTB that the <br />Durham/Chapel Hill/Carrboro MPO is going to release socioeconomic data and projections that <br />will be used for regional transportation planning for the years 2005-2035. It is anticipated that this <br />data will be released after the meeting on September 12`". He formally requested that this data be <br />included in the profile element. <br />James Carnahan lives on 122 Oak Street, Carrboro. He is a board member of The Village <br />Project, but he said that the comments he was going to make were his own. He distributed a <br />handout. The column on the right includes his suggested wording of the draft goals. He said that <br />he is particularly interested in the concept of sustainability. He agreed with Marty Mandell that <br />clarity of the sustainability goal is very important. He said that it is important to talk about the <br />outcomes of growth and development rather than use a phrase like "sustainable growth" or <br />"sustainable development". He thinks that the goal is that the outcome of all activities is <br />ecologically, economically, and socially sustainable. He thinks that the language should reflect <br />this and avoid the ambiguity of "sustainable growth" or "sustainable development". He said that a <br />couple of the elements did not have over-arching goals, and he thought that it was important for <br />consistency that they did, so he created them. He asked the County Commissioners to consider <br />the amended language of the goals, which is in bald italics. <br />Laura Blackmon made reference to the Economic Development overarching goal and said <br />that the staff is looking at the definition of economic development. She would like for the <br />Economic Development Commission to look at this again and perhaps broaden the definition. <br />