Orange County NC Website
I'm wearing three hats tonight: Citizen Pete, 20 years with Efland Fire, Deputy Chief Pete, and <br /> PageTrack Pete. <br /> What is PageTrack? A little over a year ago, I started a software company that has developed <br /> a real time tracking system for fire, EMS, and rescue responders. It's web based and runs on <br /> smart phones, iPads, and desktops. <br /> It is currently being used by many departments in the county. Those departments can use the <br /> system for free forever. <br /> I am submitting a document with my detailed questions and concerns about the OSSI path that <br /> the county is on. There is no easy way to summarize all the points. <br /> The agenda for this meeting says that after the OSSI demonstration, "The system was well- <br /> received by the stakeholders." The problem is that an email was sent out on a Wednesday <br /> that gave Fire just two days to voice any concerns about the system. Many concerns that I <br /> had voice anywhere from 1 to 5 months ago had not been address by Emergency Services. <br /> There's been talk of the strained relationship between ES and the fire departments, and the <br /> CC said that we all need to communicate better. Well, fire should have voiced any concerns <br /> they had, and ES should not have taken silence to be the same as approval. So we are on a <br /> path where this is a good chance there will be friction once again between the groups. <br /> If the fire departments can't use PageTrack with OSSI, and have to switch to the OSSI A.V.L. <br /> system, they will lose capabilities they have now while spending as much as nine times as <br /> much money. So this lack of communications could cost the fire departments .5 million dollars <br /> at start up and $50,000 per year ongoing costs. <br /> The scheduling of this vote is sad, since the CC will meet with the fire departments in just two <br /> days. A communications opportunity lost. <br /> There's a lot of talk about all the stakeholders having a voice in the development of the <br /> system. It seems to me that after the purchase, those options go down substantially. <br /> So please read my concerns. I want to avoid a situation where a year down the road everyone <br /> is yelling at each other because the system is not what they want or cost too much to <br /> implement. And even if you approve the purchase tonight, please work with Fire so that you <br /> can insure their concerns are met. Historically, Fire has not had much success convincing ES <br /> to change how they do things. Deploying this new CAD system is an opportunity to fix that <br /> problem and have better emergency service to people that are in trouble. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that there was an opportunity for a demonstration of this at <br /> the Emergency Services work group. He said that he felt that the intention is to keep an open <br /> dialogue with the fire departments. He does not want to close the door to further dialogue. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if the contract could be signed after the meeting with the <br /> fire departments and rescue squad on Thursday. <br />