Browse
Search
Minutes 10-02-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 10-02-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:10:00 AM
Creation date
11/26/2012 11:02:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 10-02-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 10-02-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-041 Ordinance amending Personnel Ordinance Regarding the Employee Performance Evaluation Process
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-042 Refund of Funds to the County's Emergency Telephone Fund (911)
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-043 - Approval of the Purchase of SunGard-OSSI E911 Comuter Aided Dispatch Sstem and Budget Amendment #2-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-085 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-086 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-087 Resolution - Comments to the DCHC Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee re 2040 Metropolitan and Comprehensive Transportation Plan
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I'm wearing three hats tonight: Citizen Pete, 20 years with Efland Fire, Deputy Chief Pete, and <br /> PageTrack Pete. <br /> What is PageTrack? A little over a year ago, I started a software company that has developed <br /> a real time tracking system for fire, EMS, and rescue responders. It's web based and runs on <br /> smart phones, iPads, and desktops. <br /> It is currently being used by many departments in the county. Those departments can use the <br /> system for free forever. <br /> I am submitting a document with my detailed questions and concerns about the OSSI path that <br /> the county is on. There is no easy way to summarize all the points. <br /> The agenda for this meeting says that after the OSSI demonstration, "The system was well- <br /> received by the stakeholders." The problem is that an email was sent out on a Wednesday <br /> that gave Fire just two days to voice any concerns about the system. Many concerns that I <br /> had voice anywhere from 1 to 5 months ago had not been address by Emergency Services. <br /> There's been talk of the strained relationship between ES and the fire departments, and the <br /> CC said that we all need to communicate better. Well, fire should have voiced any concerns <br /> they had, and ES should not have taken silence to be the same as approval. So we are on a <br /> path where this is a good chance there will be friction once again between the groups. <br /> If the fire departments can't use PageTrack with OSSI, and have to switch to the OSSI A.V.L. <br /> system, they will lose capabilities they have now while spending as much as nine times as <br /> much money. So this lack of communications could cost the fire departments .5 million dollars <br /> at start up and $50,000 per year ongoing costs. <br /> The scheduling of this vote is sad, since the CC will meet with the fire departments in just two <br /> days. A communications opportunity lost. <br /> There's a lot of talk about all the stakeholders having a voice in the development of the <br /> system. It seems to me that after the purchase, those options go down substantially. <br /> So please read my concerns. I want to avoid a situation where a year down the road everyone <br /> is yelling at each other because the system is not what they want or cost too much to <br /> implement. And even if you approve the purchase tonight, please work with Fire so that you <br /> can insure their concerns are met. Historically, Fire has not had much success convincing ES <br /> to change how they do things. Deploying this new CAD system is an opportunity to fix that <br /> problem and have better emergency service to people that are in trouble. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that there was an opportunity for a demonstration of this at <br /> the Emergency Services work group. He said that he felt that the intention is to keep an open <br /> dialogue with the fire departments. He does not want to close the door to further dialogue. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if the contract could be signed after the meeting with the <br /> fire departments and rescue squad on Thursday. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.