Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section(s) 3.3 and 6.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, <br /> as detailed on pages 89 through 90 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section 5.9 and 6.8.6 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, <br /> as detailed on pages 91 through 93 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section 5.3.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, as <br /> detailed on pages 94 through 95 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner McKee that there <br /> is sufficient evidence in the record that the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) of the <br /> Ordinance as follows: <br /> - finding there is sufficient evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 <br /> (A) (2) (a) of the UDO in that the use will maintain and promote the public health, safety <br /> and general welfare, if located where proposed and developed and operated according <br /> to the plan as submitted. <br /> This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into <br /> the record of these proceedings, including: <br /> • Attachment 1, the application, of the public hearing abstract, <br /> • Staff and applicant testimony from the Public Hearing, <br /> • Abstracts from the May 29, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing and <br /> July 11, 2012 Planning Board, <br /> • Staff findings as discussed during the July 11, 2012 Planning <br /> Board regular meeting, <br /> • Additional information supplied to the Planning Board by the <br /> applicant at its July 11, 2012 regular meeting, and <br />