Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT BOCC RESPONSE <br /> CONCERN: RESPONSE: <br /> Includes comments <br /> made during, and staff <br /> comments identified <br /> within the abstract for, <br /> the August 27, 2012 <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> TRANSPORTATION The current location of the After reviewing pictures BOCC — At its <br /> Continued entrance/exit is extremely of the area where the September 18, <br /> close to the adjacent proposed driveway shall 2012 regular <br /> entrance for the cement be located (Refer to meeting, the BOCC <br /> plant and existing foliage Attachment 2) Planning indicated they were <br /> may obstruct drivers' view staff determined during satisfied with the <br /> of on-coming traffic. the September 7, 2012 modifications. <br /> meeting the drive location <br /> was acceptable. <br /> There appears to be The applicant has BOCC — At its <br /> insufficient stacking space widened the driveway September 18, <br /> for vehicles attempting to entrance and increased 2012 regular <br /> access the site. the turn radius to meeting, the BOCC <br /> accommodate additional indicated they were <br /> stacking based on staff satisfied with the <br /> comments. modifications. <br /> Concerns were expressed Sign locations have been BOCC At its <br /> over proposed sign modified to ensure they September 18, <br /> locations. Staff wanted are located outside of 2012 regular <br /> additional detail to ensure established site triangles. meeting, the BOCC <br /> proposed signs were not indicated they were <br /> located within established satisfied with the <br /> site triangles. modifications. <br /> BOCC members After reviewing pictures BOCC — At its <br /> expressed concerns over of the area where the September 18, <br /> existing, mature, foliage proposed driveway shall 2012 regular <br /> near the proposed be located (Refer to meeting, the BOCC <br /> entrance and asked for Attachment 2) Planning indicated they were <br /> clarification if the existing staff determined during satisfied with the <br /> trees would block visibility the September 7, 2012 modifications. <br /> or create a hazard for large meeting the drive location <br /> vehicles attempting to was acceptable and the <br /> access the site. foliage should not be an <br /> issue. <br />