Orange County NC Website
October 3, 2012 Planning Board 50 <br /> agenda packet -Attachment 7 <br /> RESOLUTION CONCERNING STATEMENT OF <br /> INCONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT <br /> WITH THE ADOPTED <br /> ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition seeking to amend the <br /> Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified <br /> Development Ordinance (UDO), and <br /> WHEREAS, This petition seeks to rezone 12 acre portion of a 35.8 acre parcel of property <br /> (PIN 0910-34-5040) to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area <br /> (REDA-CZ-1) Conditional Zoning for the purpose of developing a self-storage facility. <br /> WHEREAS, the portions of property to be rezoned are identified further as follows: <br /> (PENDING FROM APPLICANT) <br /> and, <br /> WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 2.8 AND 2.92 of the UDO have not been <br /> complied with, and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 1.1.5, 1.1.7, and 2.9.1 (E) of the UDO and to Section <br /> 153A-341 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds that the applicant has not <br /> submitted sufficient documentation denoting that the rezoning will carry out the intent and <br /> purpose of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan or part thereof including, and <br /> WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment is not <br /> reasonable and is not in the public interest as it will not promote public health, safety, and <br /> general welfare, <br /> BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the proposed zoning <br /> atlas amendment, as described herein, has been deemed to be inconsistent with the goals and <br /> policies of the adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, is not reasonable, and is <br /> not in the public interest as it will not promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, <br /> and the BOCC hereby adopts this statement of inconsistency signifying same. <br /> Upon motion of Commissioner I seconded by <br /> Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this <br /> day of 2012. <br />