Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:20:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:20:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-055 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-102 Resolution Concerning Statements of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-103 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br /> Noted. <br /> 4. BOCC members asked for clarification from the application on the extent of retail <br /> operations. The Board want to be sure all retail would be connected to the self- <br /> storage operation. <br /> Anticipated retail operations are related to materials needed for storage and operating <br /> a storage business such as tape, boxes,padding, etc. <br /> Responses to Additional Comments received via email from staff on 91612012 will be in Bold <br /> Orange Italics. <br /> 1. Driveway location along the eastern property line, adjacent to the concrete <br /> property, is still a major concern for staff. There appears to be potential for <br /> vehicular conflicts due to the presence of existing large trees in the area <br /> impeding sight visibility. While it is difficult to ascertain the exact distance, the <br /> driveways appears to be 25 feet apart. <br /> Traffic attempting to turn left from the storage facility will be unable to see traffic <br /> emerging and turning left from the concrete plant. Also the existing driveway and <br /> turn radius are not conducive to allowing for 2 way traffic entering and exiting <br /> from the site. <br /> There will be a bottle neck with large vehicles attempting to enter and leave the <br /> site at the same time. Staff would recommend the following: <br /> a. Move the driveway approximately 220 feet north and locate it directly <br /> across from the proposed driveway for the office/retail area north of Mile <br /> Branch as noted on sheet(s) C-3 and.0-4. <br /> b. Widen the driveway to approximately 35 feet to allow for adequate <br /> spacing for cars—2 way traffic entering and exiting the site. <br /> c. Internal circulation will have to be modified in order to accommodate <br /> proper stacking and turn radius for vehicles <br /> As an alternative, you could do the following: <br /> d. Have a dedicated, separate, entrance and exit points for the property. <br /> The entrance could be adjacent to the concrete plant property (in fact if <br /> this option is chosen this will be the mandated entrance only point). If this <br /> option is selected the driveway radius will have to be widened to <br /> accommodate large vehicles entering the site. <br /> e. Dedicated exit would be directly across from the proposed driveway for <br /> the office/retail area north of Mile Branch as noted on sheet(s) C-3 and C- <br /> 4. <br /> f. Staff would recommend the placement of landscape islands in the drive <br /> area under this scenario to further regulate traffic flow. <br /> Either way staff is concerned the proposed means if ingress and egress will <br /> not address turn internal turn radius issues or allow for proper staging of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.