Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:20:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:20:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-055 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-102 Resolution Concerning Statements of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-103 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> Responses to Utility Service will be in Bold Orange Italics. <br /> 1. BOCC members requested written documentation from Orange County Health <br /> and Building Inspection that a chemical or other toilet system could be used to <br /> support the proposed office use. <br /> The requested documentation is attached. <br /> 2. BOCC and Planning Board members expressed reservations over the applicants <br /> desire not to develop a well on the property. Several comments were made over <br /> the need for a well to provide water for staff, to clean the facility, and to address <br /> emergencies. <br /> The applicant is checking on the suitability and availability of a well location on the <br /> site to meet this request.If this is not possible, then the applicant will be the one who <br /> will have the cost and time burden of using a power washer etc to clean out the units. <br /> Water supply at a Storage facility is not mandated by regulatory review agencies and if <br /> this item is not feasible,the applicant doesn't feel that it should be an overriding <br /> criteria related to the application for rezoning the property.If the units are left dirty as <br /> members of the BOCC indicated is often the case,and the applicant cannot adequately <br /> clean them up,then it is the applicant/owner that will suffer as no potential lessee will <br /> rent a storage unit that is dirty. Therefore it is in the applicant's best interest to keep <br /> the units clean whether it be by using an on-site well or by a portable pressure washing <br /> operation. <br /> Responses to Solid Waste will be in Bold Green Italics. <br /> 1. BOCC and Planning Board members indicated the applicant should provide a <br /> dumpster area to allow for the orderly collection and disposal of solid waste <br /> generated on the property. <br /> The Plans have been revised to show a proposed dumpster location as requested. <br /> 2. BOCC members wanted written comments from Orange County Solid Waste on <br /> the applicant's revised site plan with respect to the adequacy of any dumpster <br /> located on-site. <br /> Noted. At the time these responses were required to be submitted,the applicant was <br /> awaiting comments from Orange County Solid Waste on the revised site plan, however <br /> the location proposed is the most optimal and accessible on-site and has been discussed <br /> w/Planning Staff with no negative feedback. <br /> 3. A Planning Board member wanted additional comment from the applicant on how <br /> he intended to address the disposal of large items left on the property by former <br /> tenants. <br /> Per the applicant the customer contract clearly states that there be no unwanted <br /> storage items left at the facility. If any are left,they will be taken to the landfill site in <br /> Mt. Tirzah,Person County which is approx. 15 miles from the subject property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.