Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:20:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:20:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-055 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-102 Resolution Concerning Statements of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-103 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment - Darrell Chandler Conditional Zoning to REDA-CZ-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br /> Materials from the public hearing can be found using the following link: <br /> hftp://orangecountync.gov/OCCLERKS/120827.htm <br /> A summary of comments received during the hearing are contained within Attachment 1, the <br /> abstract from the October 3, 2012 Planning Board regular meeting. Staff will be introducing this <br /> document, and all attachments, into the record at the re-convened public hearing for the BOCC <br /> to consider as part of its deliberations. <br /> Planning Board Review: The Planning Board reviewed this item at its October 3, 2012 regular <br /> meeting. During the meeting the Board made the following decisions with regard to several <br /> outstanding development issues, specifically: <br /> I. Land Use Buffers: The applicant proposed the following: <br /> • 20 Foot Type A buffer along NC 57 and Mile Branch Road. <br /> • 10 foot buffer along the southern property line adjacent to the Wilson property <br /> (PIN 0910-22-6989). <br /> • No land use buffer along the portion of property abutting the existing concrete <br /> plant(PIN 0910-32-2905). <br /> During the public hearing and the September 18, 2012 BOCC work session, staff <br /> indicated typical land use buffers for a self-storage facility in comparable general use <br /> zoning districts were: <br /> • Type F buffer, 100 feet in width, along adjacent property lines abutting AR <br /> zoned property, and <br /> • Type B buffer, 30 feet in width, abutting adjacent road rights-of-way. <br /> With respect to the land use buffers, the Planning Board determined: <br /> a. The proposed land use buffer along Mile Branch and NC Highway 57 is <br /> acceptable as proposed by the applicant, specifically the 20 Foot Type A <br /> buffer. <br /> b. There is no need for a land use buffer along the southern property boundary <br /> with the concrete plant (PIN 0910-32-2905). <br /> c. The proposed land use buffer along the Wilson property (PIN 0910-22-6989) is <br /> sufficient, specifically the 10 foot buffer. <br /> BOCC members could offer an alternative suggestion to the applicant with respect to <br /> an acceptable land use buffer. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (2), conditions must be mutually <br /> agreed upon by the County and the applicant. <br /> 11. Installation of a well: <br /> a. The Board agreed with the BOCC that a well is necessary to ensure proper <br /> care for required vegetation as well as the cleaning of rental units. <br /> b. The Board recommended the imposition of a condition requiring the <br /> development of the well when Phase 2 of the project is developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.