Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 11/7/12 92 MOTION made by Maxecine Mitchell to accept staff findings regarding the projects compliance with Sections 5.3.2(b)of the LIDO(page 65-66 of the abstract package),Tony Blake seconded. VOTE:UNANIMOUS Larry Wright: Let's move to page 67. MOTION made by Peter Hallenbeck: to find in the affirmative the project complies with the provisions of Section 5.3.2(a) of the LIDO in that the use will maintain and promote public health safety and general welfare if located where prosed an developed and the project complies with the provisions of Section 5.3.2 (b) in that the project will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property and finally the project is consistent with the requirements of Section 5.3,2(c)specifically the location and character of the proposed use is in harmony in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations and the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the BOCC and there is no evidence entered into the record to the contrary. Maxecine Mitchell seconded. VOTE:UNANIMOUS Michael Harvey: With respect to these findings, you are required to include evidence contained within the record justifying your actions,which can include the letter from Joe Lyle,the broker,the environmental report contained in the narrative, the applicant's attachment 1, letters from State Department of Cultural Resources memorandum from Health, Orange County Solid Waste,Transportation Planning, Orange County Erosion Control, Orange County Fire Marshall as well as the Physical Impact Analysis prepared by staff and entered the record. Larry Wright: Now we move to the recommendations. Michael Harvey: On page 73,the board would like to make a statement concerning the connection to the TLC property. Peter Hallenbeck: On page 73 of the application, number 10, 1 would like to suggest that the change to"no open loop" geothermal shall be developed within the property for any purpose rather than banning all geothermal wells outright. Larry Wright: Are there any recommendations about the trail? MOTION made by Buddy Hartley that the applicant is not required having a trail that connects to the Johnson Mill Nature Trail and that the recommended condition related to the prohibition of geothermal wells be modified per Pete Hallenbeck's suggestion. Maxecine Mitchell seconded. VOTE:UNANIMOUS Larry Wright: Given these two caveats listed from page 68-73,do I have a motion relative to staffs recommendations? MOTION made by Maxecine Mitchell to accept the recommendations with the changes. Tony Blake seconded, VOTE:UNANIMOUS 5