Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 11:52:40 AM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:16:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
S Planning - Weekly Homes LLC re ICP Dunhill, LLC Special Use Permit - Agenda 11-20-2012 - 6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ <br /> 88 <br /> ~ <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: So, it would just ba easier for me,and probably for others. To the <br /> point though, and K8a- Benson made it as well, and staff made it on page G in the next tothe last <br /> paragraph. When vve adopted the Joint Planning Agreement,and there were many objections <br /> from property owners in the rural buffer about the restriction on their property, one of the things <br /> we discussed isvvmwould revisit the two-acre minimum. Over time, the two-acre minimum <br /> produces exactly what Ms. Benson said,just o two-acre parcel property, unless the land can't <br /> perk. Staff mentions that you're going to be working on something that actually looks at creating <br /> a true flexible development option for lots in the rural buffer area as to a subdivision in a band <br /> around Chapel Hill and Carrboro. I would hope that we see that in the near future as opposed <br /> to the distant future. The other thing has to do with what all the neighbors were talking about, <br /> which is groundwater. I don't remember the name of the subdivision, it was probably about five <br /> years ago, the one on Arthur Minnis Road, where it goes from pavement to dirt. The neighbors <br /> were very concerned about the effect of the subdivision on their groundwater, on their wells. <br /> One of our responses was to hire a staff person full-time to study groundwater in Orange <br /> County. And here we are, I don't see that we've made any progress in providing any report or <br /> methodology for reviewing development impacts on well usage, maybe there is no update to <br /> provide. Maybe that's the answer. We do have places where we have policies in place if there <br /> are impacts from a commercial use or from something we did. I just don't think we have <br /> adequately addressed the concerns that people in rural areas have about subdivisions that go in <br /> next to them in a time when water is becoming more scarce. Basically, I feel like I sit up here <br /> and I listen and I empathize, but I'm not sure we're doing anything to help people. I would hope <br /> that we can do something a little more proactive,whatever it may be. <br /> Commissioner Gordon: I am not anxious to revisit the rural buffer. I think we've done <br /> reasonably well in the rural buffer. There are a lot of other things that I think take priority. <br /> Maybe we'll eventually get to reconsidering it, and I think it's worked well and I don't think we <br /> should rush to reevaluate it. <br /> Chair Pelissier: There is one item in the covenant that I forgot to express my concern. I'm not <br /> sure I support the square foot size of the house of 3,000 square feet. I know it's a boilerplate, <br /> but I don't know if that's the intention here. I'd also like to just say something to what <br /> Commissioner Jacobs had said about water. I was on the Commission for the Environment <br /> some years ago when we did have a geophysicist on the board who had actually done studies <br /> in Orange County. And one of the lessons I learned from him was, as one of the presenters <br /> said tonight, that there are little pockets and this fractured rock. He said that the most important <br /> thing to do and that some counties do it is to zone your land according to the recharge rate for <br /> that area. There is a study that tells us about the water recharge rate, and that is something <br /> that can give you guidance. That would require looking at zoning according to the water for that <br /> area of the county. I don't know if we're ready to go there, but that's what was mentioned. We <br /> need to assure citizens that they have water for the development there. <br /> Commissioner McKee: In response to the last comment, I want to make sure that we're very <br /> careful that we don't micromanage ourselves into a taking of property. <br /> Chair Pelissier: I'd like to entertain a motion to "refer the matter to the Planning Board with a <br /> request that a recommendation be returned in time for the November 20, 2012 BOCC regular <br /> meeting, and <br /> Adjourn the public hearing until November 20,2012 in order to receive the Planning Board's <br /> recommendation and any submitted written comments." <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.