Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 11:52:40 AM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:16:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
S Planning - Weekly Homes LLC re ICP Dunhill, LLC Special Use Permit - Agenda 11-20-2012 - 6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
70 <br /> SU 'IT 919.732.3883 SIPPIrf-MINEER.COM <br /> DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 504 MeadovAand Drive, HIRsborough,NC 2727 8 <br /> October 1,2012 <br /> Mr. Michael Harvey <br /> Orange County <br /> Planning Department <br /> PO Box 8181 <br /> Hillsborough,NC 27278 <br /> Re: Responses to Trail Connection to TLC—Johnston Mill Nature Preserve Trail <br /> Mr. Harvey: <br /> On behalf of our client and the applicant,David Weekly Homes, Summit Design and <br /> Engineering Services is providing responses to email correspondence issued by TLC to <br /> the County Planning Staff and subsequently forwarded to Summit on Wednesday, <br /> September 26,2012. <br /> The applicant has express concerns over a trail connection to the Nature Preserve and at <br /> this time is not inclined to make this connection for several reasons as stated below: <br /> • Cost—It is very clear that the TLC has many requirements related to the <br /> construction,quality and future maintenance of any trail connection.These are <br /> additional cost that the applicant has not considered in the overall budget of the <br /> project and are cost that have no current real value as what the construction cost <br /> would be as well as the one-time endowment contribution have not been assessed <br /> and could preclude improvements proposed that would otherwise be feasible. <br /> • Safety—A distinct trail connection to the Dunhill Neighborhood would allow <br /> unmanaged foot traffic access to the proposed residential properties and could <br /> result in motorists using the shoulders and cul-de-sac of the sub-division as <br /> additional parking areas for trail access.This could also encourage the use of the <br /> Sub-Division road as an outlet to Mt. Sinai road where trail users would then be <br /> encouraged to proceed up Mt. Sinai road to the nearby parking area near Cascade <br /> Drive. <br /> • Findings of Fact—There have been no findings of fact required of the applicant <br /> that would necessitate a trail connection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.