Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 11:52:40 AM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:16:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
S Planning - Weekly Homes LLC re ICP Dunhill, LLC Special Use Permit - Agenda 11-20-2012 - 6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' <br /> 28 , <br /> From: Joe Lyle <br /> Sent: Wednesday,August 29 2012 4:08 PM <br /> To:Tom Konsler <br /> Cc: 'Ryan Jackson' <br /> Subject: RE: Mt. Sinai Rd. Subdivision <br /> O`Z9-12 <br /> TomKons|er, <br /> During the public meeting the county attorney asked us for a written statement from you regarding our conversation. <br /> Could you please draft something in your own language in response to the questions below?Please also copy Ryan <br /> Jackson ( 'd above)with your response <br /> Thankyoul <br /> Joe Lyle <br /> Subject: Mt. Sinai Rd. Subdivision <br /> Orange County Health Dept. <br /> Tom Konsler, <br /> I wanted to make sure I had accurate notes from our earlier conversation. <br /> 1. During our public meeting some neighbors were concerned that wells on the proposed subdivision could cause their <br /> well to run dry. You responded that the geography in Orange County does not lend itself to wells negatively impacting <br /> adjacent wells in terms of yield or quality. <br /> 2.When a asked how the water quality was in the area around this proposed subdivision you mentioned that <br /> approximately 20%of the wells in the county had high levels of manganese and iron and low ph levels.You also <br /> mentioned that these levels could be easily treated and very rarely cause a well to be abandoned. <br /> 3. 1 mentioned that if we proceed with a community well it would be turned over to Aqua. I asked if you have had any <br /> problems with the Aqua company.You responded that you have not had any pervasive problems with Aqua and that <br /> you thought they were one of the largest water system providers in NC. <br /> 4.When asked about the approval of community wells,you mentioned that it involves both the county and state.You <br /> said that both are involved in the pre-drilling inspection and that we should allow about 2-3 weeks to schedule an <br /> inspection.You also mentioned that your role regarding community wells would mostly be involve permitting and <br /> location and that the state would be involved in long-term monitoring. <br /> Please let me know if this is an accurate representation of our conversation or if any changes are needed. <br /> Thankyou <br /> Joe Lyle <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.