Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> No further comment necessary, the applicant concurs with the responses providing by <br /> the Planning Staff and is of the opinion that the initial comment has been adequately <br /> addressed Additionally, please find attached as"Attachment V", additional <br /> documentation from Mi. Tom Konsler regarding the local geography, ground water <br /> and the use of Geo-thermal wells. <br /> • A Planning Board member asked how much draw (i.e. gallons per unit per minute <br /> during peak usage) the proposed community well would have and what potential <br /> impact there would be on adjacent property owners. <br /> Staff Comment: The applicant indicated they did not have recharge rate data <br /> or peak usage data available but would work to formulate a response. <br /> The applicant indicated he recently had spoken with Mr. Tom Konsler of <br /> Orange County Environmental Health with respect to well issues in this area <br /> of the county. <br /> According to the applicant, Mr. Konsler indicated the geography of the area <br /> did not lend itself to there being a negative impact on adjacent well recharge <br /> rates as the direct result of the proposed development. Further, Mr. Konsler <br /> indicated other community wells operating throughout the area had not <br /> appeared to impact adjacent property as feared by local residents. <br /> This level of data related to an un-drilled well is not easily calculated and is still <br /> something that the applicant can not define at this time. The requested figure would <br /> depend on the pump that is used, how deep the well is, and other items. Again, see <br /> "Attachment I': <br /> • BOCC and Planning Board members asked what would happen in the event the <br /> proposed stormwater feature was breached, specifically where would the water <br /> go. <br /> Staff Comment: The applicant indicated the water would flow into the <br /> adjoining stream and onto adjacent property. They did not anticipate major <br /> flooding, however, resulting from a stormwater breach given the anticipated <br /> filtration rate for the feature as detailed on the submitted site plan. <br /> The BMP or SCM will be designed in accordance to and subsequently be permitted by Orange <br /> Count'sy Stormwater Division under Planning and Inspections Dept. Currently,BMP's/SCM's <br /> are designed to accommodate a certain storm, typically lyr-241ir storm in Orange County.All <br /> other storms that exceed this runoff amount will utilize an "Emergency Spillway"as is typical <br /> on all treatment facilities. Depending upon the type and location of the final designed <br /> BMP/SCM a level spreader may or may not be warranted per current county and state <br /> regulations. <br /> • A BOCC member asked about the possibility of requiring a trail through the <br /> Dunhill project to connect to an adjacent parcel owned by the Triangle Land <br /> Conservancy (TLC). Further, this BOCC member inquired about why a memo <br /> from DEAPR was not included within the quarterly public hearing agenda packet. <br /> Staff Comment: Staff has received correspondence from TLC indicating their <br /> desire not to have a trail from Dunhill connecting to their property. The <br /> concern is over liability issues as well as encouraging access to an existing <br /> trail system utilizing existing access points. <br />