Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
141 <br /> NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br /> the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) this list must be read verbatim so <br /> it is in the record. <br /> • The application package and project narrative contained within <br /> Attachment 1 of the August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> package. <br /> • Applicant, engineer, and staff testimony from the August 27, <br /> 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing and the October 3, 2012 <br /> Planning Board meeting. <br /> • The applicants letters, dated September 25, 2012 and October <br /> 2, 2012, addressing questions about the project. <br /> and <br /> • A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered <br /> into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance <br /> with established standards. <br /> If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br /> the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the <br /> Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br /> absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br /> claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br /> (2) (c). <br /> 7. Motion to either approve or deny the Special Use Permit <br /> If the motion is to approve the Special Use Permit, this motion would also need to <br /> include language indicating the BOCC imposes the recommended conditions as detailed <br /> within Attachment 6 of the abstract package. Second. Vote <br /> I <br />